ArticleAnnals of botany2025
Far-red light effects on plant photosynthesis: from short-term enhancements to long-term effects of artificial solar light.
Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leaf aging reduces photosynthetic and stomatal kinetics under fluctuating irradiance, but not steady-state traits.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Far-red light in early growth stages boosts lettuce biomass and preserves anthocyanins.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Photosynthesis under far-red light-evolutionary adaptations and bioengineering of light-harvesting complexes.FEBS letters · 2026Review
- Incident Far-Red Photons Drive Leaf Photosynthesis Less Efficiently Than PAR Light, but Are More Effective in Promoting Growth.Plant, cell & environment · 2025Article
- Article
- Dose-response of tomato fruit yield to far-red fraction in supplementary lighting.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Laser biospeckle as a method to investigate the short-term effects of far-red light on an arugula (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Photosynthesis and photoprotection in top leaves respond faster to irradiance fluctuations than bottom leaves in a tomato canopy.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Article
- Far-Red Light Supplementation in Tomato Cultivation: A Quantitative Review of Morphological and Physiological Responses.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsLong-term exposure over several days to far-red light (FR) increases leaf expansion, whereas short-term exposure (minutes) might enhance the photosystem II operating efficiency (ϕPSII). The interaction between these responses at different time scales and their impact on photosynthesis at the whole-plant level are not well understood. We aimed to assess the effects of FR in an irradiance mimicking the spectrum of sunlight (referred to as artificial solar irradiance), in both the long and short term, on whole-plant CO2 assimilation rates and in leaves at different positions in the plant.
methodsTomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants were grown under artificial solar irradiance conditions with either a severely reduced or normal fraction of FR [SUN(FR-) vs. SUN]. To elucidate the interplay between the growth light treatment and the short-term reduction of FR, we investigated this interaction at both the whole-plant and leaf levels. At the whole-plant level, CO2 assimilation rates were assessed under artificial solar irradiance with a normal fraction and a reduced fraction of FR. At the leaf level, the effects of removal and presence of FR (0FR and 60FR) during transition from high to low light on CO2 assimilation rates and chlorophyll fluorescence were evaluated in upper and lower leaves. KEY
resultsSUN(FR-) plants had lower leaf area, shorter stems and darker leaves than SUN plants. Although reducing FR during growth did not affect whole-plant photosynthesis under high light intensity, it had a negative impact at low light intensity. Short-term FR removal reduced both plant and leaf CO2 assimilation rates, but only at low light intensity and irrespective of the light treatment during growth and the leaf position. Interestingly, the kinetics of ϕPSII from high to low light were accelerated by 60FR, with a larger effect in lower leaves of SUN than in SUN(FR-) plants.
conclusionsGrowing plants with a reduced amount of FR light lowers whole-plant CO2 assimilation rates at low light intensity through reduced leaf area, despite maintaining similar leaf-level CO2 assimilation to leaves grown with a normal amount of FR. The short-term removal of FR brings about significant but marginal reductions in photosynthetic efficiency at the leaf level, regardless of the long-term growth light treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.