Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38944652›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

COVID-19 vaccination and major cardiovascular and haematological adverse events in Abu Dhabi: retrospective cohort study.

Marco A F Pimentel, Maaz Shaikh, Muna Al Safi, Yousuf Naqvi, Shadab Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco A F PimentelM42, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Maaz ShaikhM42, Abu Dhabi, UAE. mshaikh@m42.ae.ORCID 0000-0002-5466-5708
Muna Al SafiDepartment of Health (DOH), Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Yousuf NaqviDepartment of Health (DOH), Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Shadab KhanM42, Abu Dhabi, UAE. skhan@m42.ae.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread administration of COVID-19 vaccines has prompted a need to understand their safety profile. This investigation focuses on the safety of inactivated and mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, particularly concerning potential cardiovascular and haematological adverse events. A retrospective cohort study was conducted for 1.3 million individuals residing in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, who received 1.8 million doses of the inactivated BBIBP CorV (by SinoPharm) and mRNA-based BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccines between June 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022. The study's primary outcome was to assess the occurrence of selected cardiovascular and haematological events leading to hospitalization or emergency room visits within 21 days post-vaccination. Results showed no significant increase in the incidence rates of these events compared to the subsequent 22 to 42 days following vaccination. Analysis revealed no elevated risk for adverse outcomes following first (IRR 1·03; 95% CI 0·82-1·31), second (IRR 0·92; 95% CI 0·72-1·16) and third (IRR 0·82; 95% CI 0·66-1·00) doses of either vaccine. This study found no substantial link between receiving either mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines and a higher likelihood of cardiovascular or haematological events within 21 days after vaccination.

Indexed as

BNT162 VaccineCardiovascular DiseasesCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccines, InactivatedAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHematologic DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID38944652
PMCPMC11214614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.