ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2024
Sensitivity, specificity, and discordance with self-report of nail sample testing for alcohol and cannabis.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNails accumulate the alcohol metabolite, ethyl glucuronide (ETG), and the cannabis metabolite, carboxy- delta-9-THC over 3-6 months. Few studies have examined nail toxicology testing's sensitivity and specificity and the agreement between nail testing and self-reported alcohol and marijuana use.
methodsIn an ongoing clinical trial, 1101 veterans completed initial telephone questionnaires and were then asked to mail nail clippings for substance use analysis. We examined sensitivity and specificity of ETG and carboxy- delta-9-THC in nails compared to self-report of alcohol use patterns (the AUDIT-C) and substance-related harms (alcohol and THC subscales of the ASSIST). We then examined factors associated with discordance between nails and self-report.
resultsAlmost two-thirds (707/1101) of respondents mailed in nail clippings. Those with returned nails were disproportionately married, white race, older, and less depressed. At a threshold of 8pg/mg, sensitivity was only.50 to detect risky alcohol use and.49 to detect alcohol-related issues. Sensitivity for marijuana issues was only.61. Specificity was greater than.77 for all measures. Factors associated with positive nails/negative self-report (i.e. false positives) for risky alcohol use on the Audit-C included more pain and being unmarried; false positive nails for alcohol-related issues on the ASSIST were associated with being unmarried and non-Hispanic ethnicity. False positive nails for THC-related issues on the ASSIST were associated with being African American, Hispanic, and having had legal issues.
conclusionsAt standard cut-offs, nail measures had low sensitivity and higher specificity. The groups who disproportionately submit positive nails/negative self-report could have substance use patterns not adequately captured by self-report, inaccurate self-report due to social pressures, or distinct drug metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.