Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38943510›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2024

Fractional CO2 Laser for Burn Scars: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Those With and Without Laser Treatment.

Cailin Abouzeid, Jonathan Friedstat, Richard Goldstein, Kaitlyn L Chacon, Anupama Mehta, Robert L Sheridan, John T Schulz, Lewis Kazis, Jeremy Goverman, Colleen M Ryan and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cailin AbouzeidDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, MA 02129, USA.
Jonathan FriedstatDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Richard GoldsteinDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, MA 02129, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1100-9452
Kaitlyn L ChaconDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, MA 02129, USA.
Anupama MehtaDivision of Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Robert L SheridanDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
John T SchulzDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Lewis KazisRehabilitation Outcomes Center at Spaulding, Spaulding Rehabilitation, MA 02129, USA.
Jeremy GovermanDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Colleen M RyanDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6455-936X
Jeffrey C SchneiderDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, MA 02129, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6652-7700

Funding

ACL HHS 90DPBU0001ACL HHS 90DPBU0008National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn reconstruction outcomes are an area of growing investigation. Although there is evidence of measured physical improvements in scar characteristics after laser treatment, there is little information on patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare patient-reported outcomes between burn survivors with and without laser treatment. The study included participants in the Burn Model System National Database at a single center; participants that received outpatient laser treatment for burn scars were compared to a matched group of burn survivors that did not receive laser. The following outcomes were examined: Satisfaction With Life Scale, Mental and Physical Component Summary of the Veterans Rand Survey, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Regression analyses examined the associations between laser treatment and each outcome at 12 and 24 months. The study population included 287 adult burn survivors (65 laser group and 222 control group). The significant differences found between the 2 groups included: burn size (laser: 14.9, 13.5 SD, control: 8.9, 11.1 SD; P < .001), insurance type (P = .036), inhalation injury (laser: 17.2%, control: 2.7%; P < .001), and ventilator requirement (laser: 27.7%, control: 13.5%; P = .013). Laser treatment was not associated with any of the outcomes at both follow-up time points. Further research is needed to develop patient-reported outcome measures that are more sensitive to the clinical changes experienced by burn survivors receiving laser treatment.

Indexed as

BurnsCicatrixLasers, GasPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultFemaleHumansLaser TherapyMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomeburn injurieslaser therapypatient-reported outcomesreconstructive surgery

Identifiers

PMID38943510
PMCPMC11567781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.