Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38943333›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2024

Assessing the impact of transcriptomics data analysis pipelines on downstream functional enrichment results.

Victor Paton, Ricardo Omar Ramirez Flores, Attila Gabor, Pau Badia-I-Mompel, Jovan Tanevski, Martin Garrido-Rodriguez, Julio Saez-Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Victor PatonHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, and Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6074-6897
Ricardo Omar Ramirez FloresHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, and Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0087-371X
Attila GaborHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, and Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0776-1182
Pau Badia-I-MompelHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, and Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1004-3923
Jovan TanevskiHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, and Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7177-1003
Martin Garrido-RodriguezHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, and Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4125-5643
Julio Saez-RodriguezHeidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine, and Heidelberg University Hospital, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8552-8976

Funding

CRC/SFB 1550 'Molecular Circuits of Heart Disease'Heidelberg UniversityLife Science Alliance Heidelberg MannheimState Parliament of Baden-Württemberg for the Innovation Campus Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptomics is widely used to assess the state of biological systems. There are many tools for the different steps, such as normalization, differential expression, and enrichment. While numerous studies have examined the impact of method choices on differential expression results, little attention has been paid to their effects on further downstream functional analysis, which typically provides the basis for interpretation and follow-up experiments. To address this, we introduce FLOP, a comprehensive nextflow-based workflow combining methods to perform end-to-end analyses of transcriptomics data. We illustrate FLOP on datasets ranging from end-stage heart failure patients to cancer cell lines. We discovered effects not noticeable at the gene-level, and observed that not filtering the data had the highest impact on the correlation between pipelines in the gene set space. Moreover, we performed three benchmarks to evaluate the 12 pipelines included in FLOP, and confirmed that filtering is essential in scenarios of expected moderate-to-low biological signal. Overall, our results underscore the impact of carefully evaluating the consequences of the choice of preprocessing methods on downstream enrichment analyses. We envision FLOP as a valuable tool to measure the robustness of functional analyses, ultimately leading to more reliable and conclusive biological findings.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingTranscriptomeBenchmarkingCell Line, TumorData AnalysisHeart FailureHumansNeoplasmsSoftwareWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID38943333
PMCPMC11317128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.