ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Assessing the impact of transcriptomics data analysis pipelines on downstream functional enrichment results.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping ovarian cellular and molecular landscape across the lifespan of women: a scoping review.Human reproduction update · 2026Article
- Application of Systems Genetics to Investigate Molecular Pathology of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Chemical biology & drug design · 2026Review
- Multiomics: the intersection of personalized nutrition in cardiometabolic diseases.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- InCURA: integrative gene clustering based on transcription factor binding sites.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Making sense of expanding transcriptomic data: network-based approaches for studying reproduction in domestic and wild animal species.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Robust evaluation of deep learning-based representation methods for survival and gene essentiality prediction on bulk RNA-seq data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcriptomics is widely used to assess the state of biological systems. There are many tools for the different steps, such as normalization, differential expression, and enrichment. While numerous studies have examined the impact of method choices on differential expression results, little attention has been paid to their effects on further downstream functional analysis, which typically provides the basis for interpretation and follow-up experiments. To address this, we introduce FLOP, a comprehensive nextflow-based workflow combining methods to perform end-to-end analyses of transcriptomics data. We illustrate FLOP on datasets ranging from end-stage heart failure patients to cancer cell lines. We discovered effects not noticeable at the gene-level, and observed that not filtering the data had the highest impact on the correlation between pipelines in the gene set space. Moreover, we performed three benchmarks to evaluate the 12 pipelines included in FLOP, and confirmed that filtering is essential in scenarios of expected moderate-to-low biological signal. Overall, our results underscore the impact of carefully evaluating the consequences of the choice of preprocessing methods on downstream enrichment analyses. We envision FLOP as a valuable tool to measure the robustness of functional analyses, ultimately leading to more reliable and conclusive biological findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.