Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38943271›Full record

ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2025

Myological and osteological approaches to gape and bite force reconstruction in Smilodon fatalis.

Ashley R Deutsch, Arin Berger, Lara L Martens, Benjamin R Witt, Rachel L J Smith, Adam Hartstone-Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Sharpening our understanding of saber-tooth biomechanics.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025
    Review
  4. Commentary: What's so interesting about sabertooths?Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashley R DeutschDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8535-3280
Arin BergerDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Lara L MartensDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Benjamin R WittDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Rachel L J SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Adam Hartstone-RoseDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5307-5573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Masticatory gape and bite force are important behavioral and ecological variables. While much has been written about the highly derived masticatory anatomy of Smilodon fatalis, there remains a great deal of debate about their masticatory behaviors. To that end, we establish osteological proxies for masticatory adductor fascicle length (FL) based on extant felids and apply these along with previously validated techniques to S. fatalis to provide estimates of fascicle lengths, maximum osteological gapes, and bite force. While the best correlated FL proxies in extant felids do not predict particularly long fascicles, these proxies may be of value for less morphologically distinct felids. A slightly less well correlated proxy predicts a temporalis FL 15% longer than that of Panthera tigris. While angular maximum bony gape is significantly larger in S. fatalis than it is in extant felids, linear gape at the canine tip and carnassial notch were not significantly different from those of extant felids. Finally, we produce anatomical bite force estimates of 1283.74 N at the canine and 4671.41 N at the carnassial, which are similar in magnitude to estimates not of the largest felids but of the much smaller P. onca, with S. fatalis producing slightly less force at the canines and more at the carnassials. These estimates align with previous predictions that S. fatalis may have killed large prey with canine shearing bites produced, in part, by force contributions of the postcranial muscles.

Indexed as

Bite ForceFelidaeMasticationMasticatory MusclesAnimalsfascicle lengthmasticatory musclessabertooth

Identifiers

PMID38943271
PMCPMC12506842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.