Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38943211›Full record

ReviewJournal of extracellular vesicles2024

Therapeutics of the future: Navigating the pitfalls of extracellular vesicles research from an osteoarthritis perspective.

Antoine Karoichan, Sarah Boucenna, Maryam Tabrizian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Engineered Extracellular Vesicles in Arthritic Diseases: Therapeutic Applications & Challenges.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antoine KaroichanFaculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0657-7746
Sarah BoucennaFaculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Maryam TabrizianFaculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5050-4480

Funding

Canada Research Chair-Tier 1 in Nanomedicine and Regenerative Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles have gained wide momentum as potential therapeutics for osteoarthritis, a highly prevalent chronic disease that still lacks an approved treatment. The membrane-bound vesicles are secreted by all cells carrying different cargos that can serve as both disease biomarkers and disease modifiers. Nonetheless, despite a significant peak in research regarding EVs as OA therapeutics, clinical implementation seems distant. In addition to scalability and standardization challenges, researchers often omit to focus on and consider the proper tropism of the vesicles, the practicality and relevance of their source, their low native therapeutic efficacy, and whether they address the disease as a whole. These considerations are necessary to better understand EVs in a clinical light and have been comprehensively discussed and ultimately summarized in this review into a conceptualized framework termed the nanodiamond concept. Future perspectives are also discussed, and alternatives are presented to address some of the challenges and concerns.

Indexed as

BiomarkersExtracellular VesiclesOsteoarthritisAnimalsHumansBiomarkersclinical translationextracellular vesiclesosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID38943211
PMCPMC11213691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.