Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38943076›Full record

Trial reportBMC primary care2024

An exploratory randomised trial investigating feasibility, potential impact and cost effectiveness of link workers for people living with multimorbidity attending general practices in deprived urban communities.

Bridget Kiely, Anna Hobbins, Fiona Boland, Barbara Clyne, Emer Galvin, Vivienne Byers, Sonali Loomba, Patrick O'Donnell, Deirdre Connolly, Eamon O ' Shea and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Addressing the inverse care law in Scottish general practice: systematic scoping review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bridget KielyDepartment of General Practice, Clinical Research Fellow, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland. bridgetkiely@rcsi.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5752-0432
Anna HobbinsCentre for Research in Medical Devices (CÚRAM, RC/2073_P2) and Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, University of Galway, SFI 13, Galway, Ireland.
Fiona BolandData Science Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland.
Barbara ClyneDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland.
Emer GalvinRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland.
Vivienne ByersEnvironment Sustainability and Health Institute, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Sonali LoombaRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland.
Patrick O'DonnellGraduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Deirdre ConnollyDiscipline of Occupational Therapy, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Eamon O ' SheaSchool of Business and Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Susan M SmithDiscipline of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial prescribing link workers are non-health or social care professionals who connect people with psychosocial needs to non-clinical community supports. They are being implemented widely, but there is limited evidence for appropriate target populations or cost effectiveness. This study aimed to explore the feasibility, potential impact on health outcomes and cost effectiveness of practice-based link workers for people with multimorbidity living in deprived urban communities.

methodsA pragmatic exploratory randomised trial with wait-list usual care control and blinding at analysis was conducted during the COVID 19 pandemic (July 2020 to January 2021). Participants had two or more ongoing health conditions, attended a general practitioner (GP) serving a deprived urban community who felt they may benefit from a one-month practice-based social prescribing link worker intervention.. Feasibility measures were recruitment and retention of participants, practices and link workers, and completion of outcome data. Primary outcomes at one month were health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) and mental health (HADS). Potential cost effectiveness from the health service perspective was evaluated using quality adjusted life years (QALYs), based on conversion of the EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP-A capability index to utility scoring.

resultsFrom a target of 600, 251 patients were recruited across 13 general practices. Randomisation to intervention (n = 123) and control (n = 117) was after baseline data collection. Participant retention at one month was 80%. All practices and link workers (n = 10) were retained for the trial period. Data completion for primary outcomes was 75%. There were no significant differences identified using mixed effects regression analysis in EQ-5D-5L (MD 0.01, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.09) or HADS (MD 0.05, 95% CI -0.63 to 0.73), and no cost effectiveness advantages. A sensitivity analysis that considered link workers operating at full capacity in a non-pandemic setting, indicated the probability of effectiveness at the €45,000 ICER threshold value for Ireland was 0.787 using the ICECAP-A capability index.

conclusionsWhile the trial under-recruited participants mainly due to COVID-19 restrictions, it demonstrates that robust evaluations and cost utility analyses are possible. Further evaluations are required to establish cost effectiveness and should consider using the ICE-CAP-A wellbeing measure for cost utility analysis. REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on ISRCTN. TITLE: Use of link workers to provide social prescribing and health and social care coordination for people with complex multimorbidity in socially deprived areas. TRIAL ID: ISRCTN10287737. Date registered 10/12/2019. Link: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10287737.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCOVID-19Feasibility StudiesGeneral PracticeMultimorbidityAdultAgedCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2Urban PopulationCost analysisGeneral practiceMultimorbidityPragmatic clinical trialPrimary careSocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID38943076
PMCPMC11212363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.