Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38943011›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Interdisciplinary assessment and treatment of paediatric drooling: two decades of experience by the Nijmegen saliva control team reflected in a stepwise algorithm.

Lynn B Orriëns, Sandra A F de Groot, Jan J W van der Burg, Frank J A van den Hoogen, Karen van Hulst, Corrie E Erasmus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lynn B Orriëns *Department of Paediatric Neurology, Division of Paediatrics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Lynn.Orriens@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0561-4768
Sandra A F de Groot *Department of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jan J W van der BurgDepartment of Paediatric Rehabilitation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8114-0459
Frank J A van den HoogenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2935-5599
Karen van Hulst *Department of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9456-3450
Corrie E Erasmus *Department of Paediatric Neurology, Division of Paediatrics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6657-941X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anterior and posterior drooling are prevalent comorbidities in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Considering the heterogeneity of the patient population and the multifactorial aetiology of drooling, an interdisciplinary and individualised treatment approach is indispensable. However, no tool for stepwise decision-making in the treatment of paediatric drooling has been developed previously. Within the Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, care for children with anterior and/or posterior drooling secondary to neurodevelopmental disabilities is coordinated by a saliva control team with healthcare professionals from six disciplines. In alignment with international literature, published guidelines, and evidence gained from two decades of experience and research by our team, this paper proposes an algorithm reflecting the assessment and treatment approach applied in our clinic. First, directions are provided to decide on the necessity of saliva control treatment, taking type of drooling, the child's age, and the severity and impact of drooling into account. Second, the algorithm offers guidance on the choice between available treatment options, highlighting the importance of accounting for child characteristics and child and caregiver preferences in clinical (shared) decision-making.

conclusionsWith this algorithm, we aim to emphasise the importance of repeated stepwise decision-making in the assessment and treatment of drooling in children during their childhood, encouraging healthcare professionals to apply a holistic approach. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Children with anterior or posterior drooling secondary to neurodevelopmental disabilities comprise a heterogeneous group, necessitating an individualised treatment approach. • No stepwise decision-making tool is available for the treatment of paediatric drooling. WHAT IS NEW: • Deciding on the necessity of saliva control treatment should be a conscious process, based on type of drooling, age, and drooling severity and impact. • Type of drooling, age, cognition, oral motor skills, self-awareness, posture, diagnosis, and child/caregiver preferences need to be considered to decide on the optimal treatment.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSialorrheaAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHumansInfantMaleNetherlandsNeurodevelopmental DisordersPatient Care TeamChildrenClinical decision-makingDroolingInterdisciplinary careSaliva control team

Identifiers

PMID38943011
PMCPMC11322295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.