Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38942981›Full record

ArticleAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2024

Utilizing X-ray diffraction in conjunction with competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) and principal component analysis for the discrimination of medicinal pearl powder and nacre powder.

Chaogang Xing, Jingqun Yuan, Chenyang Shi, Xuancheng Chen, Shimin Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chaogang XingAnalysis Center of Agrobiology and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, People's Republic of China. xcg@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5664-584X
Jingqun YuanAnalysis Center of Agrobiology and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, People's Republic of China.
Chenyang ShiAnalysis Center of Agrobiology and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, People's Republic of China.
Xuancheng ChenAnalysis Center of Agrobiology and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, People's Republic of China.
Shimin LiAnalysis Center of Agrobiology and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Basic Public Welfare Research Program of Zhejiang Province LGC21D010001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nacre powder, often utilized to counterfeit medicinal pearl powder due to their similar chemical composition and appearance, poses a challenge in product authentication. This study introduces a rapid and efficient method for distinguishing between medicinal pearl powder and nacre powder using X-ray diffraction in conjunction with principal component analysis (PCA). The X-ray diffraction pattern underwent preprocessing techniques including smoothing denoising (Savitzky-Golay filter, 5-point) and second-order derivative analysis. Subsequently, PCA was employed for dimensionality reduction modeling. The CARS method was applied to select optimal variables for model refinement, determining the data preprocessing approach and key modeling variables. This method demonstrates the capability to accurately differentiate between pearl powder, nacre powder, and even counterfeit samples containing up to 90% pearl powder. With a high accuracy rate, swift operational speed, and potential for automation, this approach shows promise for practical implementation in the realm of pearl powder quality control.

Indexed as

CARS methodNacre powderPCAPearl powderX-ray diffraction

Identifiers

PMID38942981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.