ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2025
"Something Like That": Awareness and Acceptability of HIV PrEP and PEP Among Kenyan Adolescents.
Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peer-led public service announcement creation workshops for adolescent sexual and reproductive health education in Kenya.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Factors associated with PEP awareness among adolescent girls and young women in Eswatini.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
- Qualitative and quantitative research on preferences and perceptions regarding HIV post-exposure prophylaxis among young women, men, female sex workers, members of the LGBTQ + community and people who inject drugs in Kenya, Nigeria and Zimbabwe.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdolescents account for 15% of new HIV cases in Kenya. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are highly effective prevention tools, but uptake is low among adolescents, particularly in resource-limited settings. We assessed awareness and acceptability of PrEP and PEP among Kenyan adolescents.
methodFocus group discussions were conducted with 120 adolescent boys and girls ages 15 to 19 in Kisumu. Data were analyzed using the Framework Approach.
resultsAdolescent participants often had not heard of or could not differentiate between PrEP and PEP. They also confused these HIV prevention tools with emergency contraceptives. Taking a daily pill to prevent HIV was perceived as analogous to taking a pill to treat HIV. Boys were aware of and willing to consider using PrEP and PEP due to their dislike for using condoms. Adolescents identified insufficient information, cost, and uncomfortableness speaking with healthcare workers about their HIV prevention needs due to sexuality stigma as barriers to using PrEP and PEP.
conclusionLow awareness and poor understanding of PrEP and PEP among adolescents reveal the need for increased education and sensitization about these HIV prevention options. Expanding access to sexual and reproductive health services that are tailored to the needs of adolescents and staffed with non-judgmental providers could help reduce sexuality stigma as a barrier to accessing care. New HIV prevention approaches such as long-acting injectables or implants, on-demand regimens, and multipurpose prevention technologies may encourage increased uptake of PrEP and PEP by adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38942977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.