ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2024
Evaluation of the superior pubic ramus and supra acetabular corridors using statistical shape modelling.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility study of antegrade insertion of lateral compression type-II screws guided solely by the combined obturator-oblique outlet view.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- The anatomical bone corridor study of schanz screw placement in adolescent pelvic ring fractures via three-dimensional CT.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive screw fixation of the anterior pelvic ring and the distal ilium : Tips and tricks to be successful.Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2025Review
- Special screw corridors and imaging in pelvic ring trauma.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe incidence of osteoporotic pelvic fractures is increasing. The broken anterior pelvic ring is preferentially fixed with long intramedullary screws, which require a good understanding of the patient-specific anatomy to prevent joint perforation. The aim of this study was to assess the variability of the superior pubic ramus and the supra acetabular corridors' length and width using statistical shape modelling. MATERIALS AND
methodsA male and female statistical shape model was made based on 59 forensic CT scans. For the superior pubic ramus and the supra acetabular corridor the longest and widest completely fitting cylinder was created for the first 5 principal components (PC) of both models, male and female pelvises separately.
resultsA total of 59 pelvises were included in this study of which 36 male and 23 female. The first 5 principal components explained 75% and 79% of the pelvic variation in males and females, respectively. Within 3 PCs of the female statistical shape model (SSM) a superior pubic ramus corridor of < 7.3 mm was found, 5.5 mm being the narrowest linear corridor measured. Both corridors in all PCs of the male SSM measured > 7.3 mm.
conclusionWithin females a 7.3 mm and 6.5 mm screw won't always fit in the superior pubic ramus corridor, especially if a flat sacrum, a small pelvis or a wide subpubic angle are present. The supra acetabular corridor did not seem to have sex-specific differences. In the supra-acetabular corridor there was always enough space to accommodate a 7.3 mm screw, both in males and females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38942934What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.