ArticleScientific reports2024
Improving the performance of 3D image model compression based on optimized DEFLATE algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focuses on optimizing and designing the Delayed-Fix-Later Awaiting Transmission Encoding (DEFLATE) algorithm to enhance its compression performance and reduce the compression time for models, specifically in the context of compressing NX three-dimensional (3D) image models. The DEFLATE algorithm, a dual-compression technique combining the LZ77 algorithm and Huffman coding, is widely employed for compressing multimedia data and 3D models. Three 3D models of varying sizes are selected as subjects for experimentation. The Wavelet algorithm, C-Bone algorithm, and DEFLATE algorithm are utilized for compression, with subsequent analysis of the compression ratio and compression time. The experimental findings demonstrate the DEFLATE algorithm's exceptional performance in compressing 3D image models. Notably, when compressing small and medium-sized 3D models, the DEFLATE algorithm exhibits significantly higher compression ratios compared to the Wavelet and C-Bone algorithms while also achieving shorter compression times. Compared to the Wavelet algorithm, the DEFLATE algorithm enhances the compression performance of 3D image models by 15% and boosts data throughput by 49%. While the compression ratio of the DEFLATE algorithm for large 3D models is comparable to that of the Wavelet and C-Bone algorithms, it notably reduces the actual compression time. Furthermore, the DEFLATE algorithm enhances data transmission reliability in NX 3D image model compression by 12.1% compared to the Wavelet algorithm. Therefore, the following conclusions are drawn: the DEFLATE algorithm serves as an excellent compression algorithm for 3D image models. It showcases significant advantages in compressing small and medium-sized models while remaining highly practical for compressing large 3D models. This study offers valuable insights for enhancing and optimizing the DEFLATE algorithm, and it serves as a valuable reference for future research on 3D image model compression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.