ArticleScientific reports2024
Optimizing microbial strain selection for pyrethroid biodegradation in contaminated environments through a TOPSIS-based decision-making system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosing soil bioremediation failure: evidence-weighted pathways from mechanism to field closure.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Road safety measurement with reliability using an advanced hybrid decision model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Environmental and Molecular Strategy for the Evaluation of Fluroxypyr and Nature-Derived Compounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Hesitant bi-fuzzy multi-attribute information fusion with expert reliability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fluroxypyr Inhibits Maize Growth by Disturbing the Diversity of the Endophytic Bacterial Communities in Maize Roots.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Evaluating music education interventions for mental health in Chinese university student: a dual fuzzy analytic method.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-01-21Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improved and contemporary agriculture relies heavily on pesticides, yet some can be quite persistent and have a stable chemical composition, posing a significant threat to the ecology. Removing harmful effects is upon their degradability. Biodegradation must be emphasized to lower pesticide degradation costs, especially in the soil. Here, a decision-making system was used to determine the best microbial strain for the biodegradation of the pyrethroid-contaminated soil. In this system, the criteria chosen as: pH (C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.