ArticleAging2024
Exploring the prognostic analysis of autophagy and tumor microenvironment based on monocyte cells in lung cancer.
Article in Aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ipilimumab and nivolumab for cancer treatment: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Distinguishing granulomatous lobular mastitis from breast cancer using a clinical-radiomics nomogram to improve diagnostic accuracy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-omics and Mendelian randomization identifyTranslational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A deep understanding of the biological mechanisms of lung cancer offers more precise treatment options for patients. In our study, we integrated data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to investigate lung adenocarcinoma. Analyzing 538 lung cancer samples and 31 normal samples, we focused on 3076 autophagy-related genes. Using Seurat, dplyr, tidyverse, and ggplot2, we conducted single-cell data analysis, assessing the quality and performing Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and t-SNE analyses. Differential analysis of TCGA data using the "Limma" package, followed by immune infiltration analysis using the CIBERSORT algorithm, led us to identify seven key genes. These genes underwent further scrutiny through consensus clustering and gene set variation analysis (GSVA). We developed a prognostic model using Lasso Cox regression and multivariable Cox analysis, which was then validated with a nomogram, predicting survival rates for lung adenocarcinoma. The model's accuracy and universality were corroborated by ROC curves. Additionally, we explored the relationship between immune checkpoint genes and immune cell infiltration and identified two key genes, HLA-DQB1 and OLR1. This highlighted their potential as therapeutic targets. Our comprehensive approach sheds light on the molecular landscape of lung adenocarcinoma and offers insights into potential treatment strategies, emphasizing the importance of integrating single-cell and genomic data in cancer research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.