Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38942437›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2024

Frontline nursing staff's perceptions of intravenous medication administration: the first step toward safer infusion processes-a qualitative study.

Masashi Uramatsu, Naoko Kimura, Takako Kojima, Yoshikazu Fujisawa, Tomoko Oto, Paul Barach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Masashi UramatsuTokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Japan masura@tokyo-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9621-4366
Naoko KimuraTokyo Medical University Hospital, Shinjuku-ku, Japan.
Takako KojimaTokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Japan.
Yoshikazu FujisawaDepartment of Quality and Patient Safety, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoko OtoTokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Japan.
Paul BarachJefferson College of Population Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7906-698X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIntravenous medication errors continue to significantly impact patient safety and outcomes. This study sought to clarify the complexity and risks of the intravenous administration process.

designA qualitative focus group interview study.

settingFocused interviews were conducted using process mapping with frontline nurses responsible for medication administration in September 2020.

participantsFront line experiened nurses from a Japanese tertiary teaching hospital. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was to identify the mental models frontline nurses used during intravenous medication administration, which influence their interactions with patients, and secondarily, to examine the medication process gaps between the mental models nurses perceive and the actual defined medication administration process.

resultsWe found gaps between the perceived clinical administration process and the real process challenges with an emphasis on the importance of verifying to see if the drug was ordered for the patient immediately before its administration.

conclusionsThis novel and applied improvement approach can help nurses and managers better understand the process vulnerability of the infusion process and develop a deeper understanding of the administration steps useful for reliably improving the safety of intravenous medications.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsMedication ErrorsPatient SafetyQualitative ResearchAdministration, IntravenousAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousInterviews as TopicJapanMaleNursing Staff, HospitalPerceptionFocus GroupsMedication safetyPatient safety

Identifiers

PMID38942437
PMCPMC11216072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.