Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38942426›Full record

SynthesisRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2025

Emotional and psychosocial function after dorsal column spinal cord stimulator implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Johana Klasova, Nasir Hussain, Ibrahim Umer, Ahmed Al-Hindawi, Mariam ElSaban, Simmy Lahori, Ryan S D'Souza

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07743905 (Virtual Pain Neuroscience Education for Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07743905 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Pain Neuroscience Education for Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArkansasRan2026 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsChronic Pain, Chronic Pain Due to Injury, Failed Back Syndrome, Persistent Spinal Pain SyndromeArmsSCS-PNE intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johana KlasovaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Nasir HussainDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0353-1002
Ibrahim UmerDepartment of Anesthesiology, St Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, New Jersey, USA.
Ahmed Al-HindawiRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland Medical University of Bahrain, Al Muharraq, Bahrain.
Mariam ElSabanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Simmy LahoriDepartment of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ryan S D'SouzaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA DSouza.Ryan@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4601-9837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in chronic pain studies is traditionally assessed by pain scores, which do not reflect the multidimensional nature of pain perception. Despite the evidence of SCS's influence on emotional functioning comprehensive assessments of its effect remain lacking.

objectiveTo assess changes in emotional and psychosocial functioning in patients who underwent SCS implantation for chronic pain. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL and Scopus databases were searched for original peer-reviewed publications reporting emotional functioning after SCS. The primary outcomes were a pooled mean difference (MD) in anxiety, depression, global functioning, mental well-being and pain catastrophizing at 12 months. The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to determine the quality of evidence.

findingsThirty-two studies were included in the primary analysis. Statistically significant improvements were observed in anxiety (MD -2.16; 95% CI -2.84 to -1.49; p<0.001), depression (MD -4.66; 95% CI -6.26 to -3.06; p<0.001), global functioning (MD 20.30; 95% CI 14.69 to 25.90; p<0.001), mental well-being (MD 4.95; 95% CI 3.60 to 6.31; p<0.001), and pain catastrophizing (MD -12.09; 95% CI -14.94 to -9.23; p<0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed differences in Global Assessment of Functioning and mental well-being based on study design and in depression based on waveform paradigm.

conclusionThe results highlight the statistically and clinically significant improvements in emotional and psychosocial outcomes in patients with chronic pain undergoing SCS therapy. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution due to the very low certainty of evidence per the GRADE criteria. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023446326.

Indexed as

Chronic PainEmotionsPsychosocial FunctioningSpinal Cord StimulationHumansPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeBack PainCHRONIC PAINComplex Regional Pain SyndromesPain ManagementSpinal Cord Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38942426
PMCPMC12573318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.