ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2024
Integrated Short-TE and Hadamard-edited Multi-Sequence (ISTHMUS) for advanced MRS.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ivosidenib and Vorasidenib Decrease Intratumoral 2-Hydroxyglutarate and Total Choline Levels in Patients with Lower-Grade Glioma: An In Vivo MR Spectroscopy Study.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Identifying Out-of-Voxel Echoes in Edited MRS With Phase Cycle Inversion.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Gradient Scheme Optimization for PRESS-Localized Edited MRS Using Weighted Pathway Suppression.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Gradient scheme optimization for PRESS-localized edited MRS using weighted pathway suppression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Identifying out-of-voxel echoes in edited MRS with phase cycle inversion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The Role of Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Neonatal and Fetal Brain Research.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Quantifying brain development in the HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) Study: The magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy protocol.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Pitfalls in 2HG Detection With TE-Optimized MRS at 3T.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo examine data quality and reproducibility using ISTHMUS, which has been implemented as the standardized MR spectroscopy sequence for the multi-site Healthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) study.
methodsISTHMUS is the consecutive acquisition of short-TE PRESS (32 transients) and long-TE HERCULES (224 transients) data with dual-TE water reference scans. Voxels were positioned in the centrum semiovale, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and bilateral thalamus regions. After acquisition, ISTHMUS data were separated into the PRESS and HERCULES portions for analysis and modeled separately using Osprey. In vivo experiments were performed in 10 healthy volunteers (6 female; 29.5±6.6 years). Each volunteer underwent two scans on the same day. Differences in metabolite measurements were examined. T
resultsNo significant difference in linewidth was observed between PRESS and HERCULES. Bilateral thalamus spectra had produced significantly higher (p<0.001) linewidth compared to the other three regions. Linewidth measurements were similar between scans, with scan-to-scan differences under 1 Hz for most subjects. Paired t-tests indicated a significant difference only in PRESS NAAG between the two thalamus scans (p=0.002). T
conclusionsISTHMUS facilitated data acquisition and post-processing and reduced operator workload to eliminate potential human error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.