ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2024
Dynamics of crevice microbubbles that cause the twinkling artifact.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Passive cavitation detection analysis of materials with varying levels of color Doppler twinkling.Ultrasonics · 2027Article
- The "snow globe" sign: a microvascular flow imaging artifact in cystic lesions, and the role of dispersed internal debris.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Analysis of Color Doppler Twinkling on Breast Biopsy Markers With Hydrostatic Overpressurization and Micro-CT Imaging.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Doppler ultrasound twinkling artifact, a rapid color shift, appears on pathological mineralizations and is theorized to arise from scattering off micron-sized crevice microbubbles. However, the influence of crevice number and size as well as the bubble dynamics on twinkling is not well-understood. Cylinders with diameters of 0.8-1.2 µm and depths of 1 µm were etched into a silicon wafer and crevice bubbles were driven at 0.75, 2.5, and 5.0 MHz while monitoring with high-speed photography. Experimental results were compared to a derived crevice bubble model. On three separate wafers, cylindrical crevices (10 or 100) with diameters of 1, 10, or 100 µm and depths of 10 µm were etched and imaged with a research ultrasound system in Doppler mode at 5, 7.8, and 18.5 MHz. Within the pressure ranges studied here (∼1MPa), no bubble oscillation was observed for the 0.8-1.2 µm crevice bubbles which matched computational results. Crevices with 1 and 10 µm diameters produced more twinkling than 100 µm crevices at 5 and 7.8 MHz. In contrast, 100 µm crevices produced more twinkling than 1 or 10 µm crevices at 18.5 MHz (p < 0.001 in all cases). These results provide better insight into how crevice bubbles cause twinkling on pathological mineralizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.