Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38941595›Full record

ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2024

Intramural Health Care Through Video Consultations and the Need for Referrals and Hospital Admissions: Retrospective Quantitative Subanalysis of an Evaluation Study.

Katharina Schmalstieg-Bahr, Miriam Giovanna Colombo, Roland Koch, Joachim Szecsenyi, Friedrich Völker, Eva Elisabeth Blozik, Martin Scherer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katharina Schmalstieg-BahrDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7067-9037
Miriam Giovanna ColomboInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2814-1000
Roland KochInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6500-928X
Joachim SzecsenyiDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4483-0028
Friedrich VölkerA+ Videoclinic GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9333-6184
Eva Elisabeth BlozikA+ Videoclinic GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6773-4487
Martin SchererDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3448-9679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn comparison to the general population, prison inmates are at a higher risk for drug abuse and psychiatric, as well as infectious, diseases. Although intramural health care has to be equivalent to extramural services, prison inmates have less access to primary and secondary care. Furthermore, not every prison is constantly staffed with a physician. Since transportation to the nearest extramural medical facility is often resource-intensive, video consultations may offer cost-effective health care for prison inmates.

objectiveThis study aims to quantify the need for referrals to secondary care services and hospital admissions when video consultations with family physicians and psychiatrists are offered in prison.

methodsIn 5 German prisons, a mixed methods evaluation study was conducted to assess feasibility, acceptance, and reasons for conducting video consultations with family physicians and psychiatrists. This analysis uses quantitative data from these consultations (June 2018 to February 2019) in addition to data from a sixth prison added in January 2019 focusing on referral and admission rates, as well as reasons for encounters.

resultsAt the initiation of the project, 2499 prisoners were detained in the 6 prisons. A total of 435 video consultations were conducted by 12 physicians (3 female and 7 male family physicians, and 2 male psychiatrists during the study period). The majority were scheduled consultations (341/435, 78%). In 68% (n=294) of all encounters, the patient was asked to consult a physician again if symptoms persisted or got worse. In 26% (n=115), a follow-up appointment with either the video consultant or prison physician was scheduled. A referral to other specialties, most often psychiatry, was necessary in 4% (n=17) of the cases. Only in 2% (n=8) of the consultations, a hospital admission was needed. Usually, hospital admissions were the result of unscheduled consultations, and the videoconferencing system was the method of communication in 88% (n=7) of these cases, while 12% (n=1) were carried out over the phone. Reasons for admissions were severe abdominal pain, hypotension, unstable angina or suspected myocardial infarction, or a suspected schizophrenic episode.

conclusionsMost scheduled and unscheduled consultations did not require subsequent patient transport to external health care providers. Using telemedicine services allowed a prompt patient-physician encounter with the possibility to refer patients to other specialties or to admit them to a hospital if necessary.

Indexed as

admission ratee-consultfamily medicinehealth care deliveryhealth care systemhospital admissionintramuralintramural health carepenalprimary careprisonreferralremote careservice deliverytelemedicinevideo consultvirtual care

Identifiers

PMID38941595
PMCPMC11245654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.