Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38941528›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of physical chemistry2024

3D Nanocrystallography and the Imperfect Molecular Lattice.

Niko Vlahakis, James Holton, Nicholas K Sauter, Peter Ercius, Aaron S Brewster, Jose A Rodriguez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of physical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Convergent-beam X-ray crystallography.Journal of applied crystallography · 2026
    Article
  2. Electrons and X-rays for diffraction and imaging.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niko VlahakisDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry; UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics; and STROBE, NSF Science and Technology Center, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; email: jrodriguez@mbi.ucla.edu.
James HoltonMolecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA; email: asbrewster@lbl.gov.
Nicholas K SauterMolecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA; email: asbrewster@lbl.gov.
Peter ErciusNational Center for Electron Microscopy, Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA; email: percius@lbl.gov.
Aaron S BrewsterMolecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA; email: asbrewster@lbl.gov.
Jose A RodriguezDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry; UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics; and STROBE, NSF Science and Technology Center, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; email: jrodriguez@mbi.ucla.edu.

Funding

DIALS: New Computational Methods to Enable Challenging Crystallographic ExperimentsR01GM117126 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI SAUTER, NICHOLAS K · 2016 to 2023
$6.1M
Micro Electron Diffraction of Toxic and/or Infectious Macromolecular NanoassembliesR35GM128867 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Jose Alfonso Rodriguez · 2018 to 2026
$3.1M
Eliminating Critical Systematic Errors In Structural Biology With Next-Generation SimulationR01GM124149 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOLTON, JAMES M · 2017 to 2024
$2.5M
Bridging the Gap Between Prediction and Reality in Structural BiologyR35GM158447 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI James M Holton · 2025 to 2026
$952k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117126NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124149NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128867NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM158447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crystallographic analysis relies on the scattering of quanta from arrays of atoms that populate a repeating lattice. While large crystals built of lattices that appear ideal are sought after by crystallographers, imperfections are the norm for molecular crystals. Additionally, advanced X-ray and electron diffraction techniques, used for crystallography, have opened the possibility of interrogating micro- and nanoscale crystals, with edges only millions or even thousands of molecules long. These crystals exist in a size regime that approximates the lower bounds for traditional models of crystal nonuniformity and imperfection. Accordingly, data generated by diffraction from both X-rays and electrons show increased complexity and are more challenging to conventionally model. New approaches in serial crystallography and spatially resolved electron diffraction mapping are changing this paradigm by better accounting for variability within and between crystals. The intersection of these methods presents an opportunity for a more comprehensive understanding of the structure and properties of nanocrystalline materials.

Indexed as

3DEDcrystallographyMicroEDnanocrystalSFX

Identifiers

PMID38941528
PMCPMC11801403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.