ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2024
Using neurocognitive phenotypes to inform interventions for adult survivors of childhood cancer.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cognitive complaints and their associations with role functioning limitations among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors in Hong Kong.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeurocognitive impairments are sequelae of childhood cancer treatment, however little guidance is given to clinicians on common phenotypes of impairment or modifiable risk factors that could lead to personalized interventions in survivorship.
methodsStandardized clinical testing of neurocognitive function was conducted in 2958 (74.1%) eligible survivors, who were at least 5 years postdiagnosis and aged older than 18 years, and 477 community controls. Impairment was examined across 20 measures, and phenotypes were determined by latent class analysis. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate risk for phenotype, predicted by cancer diagnosis and treatment exposures, chronic health conditions, and lifestyle, adjusted for sex and age. Associations between phenotypes and social attainment were examined.
resultsFive neurocognitive phenotypes were identified in survivors (global impairment 3.7%, impaired attention 5.0%, memory impairment 7.2%, processing speed and executive function impairment 9.3%, no impairment 74.8%). Risk of global impairment was associated with severe chronic health condition burden (odds ratio [OR] = 20.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.41 to 35.63) including cerebrovascular disease (OR = 14.5, 95% CI = 5.47 to 38.44) and cerebrovascular accident (OR = 14.7, 95% CI = 7.50 to 26.40). Modifiable risk factors, such as quitting smoking, reduced risk for global impairment (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.06 to 0.66). Low physical activity increased risk for global impairment (OR = 4.54, 95% CI = 2.86 to 7.21), attention impairment (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.41 to 2.87), processing speed and executive function impairment (OR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.46 to 2.48), and memory impairment (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.54 to 2.82).
conclusionsResults support the clinical utility of neurocognitive phenotyping to develop risk profiles and personalized clinical interventions, such as preventing cerebrovascular disease in anthracycline-treated survivors by preventing hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and sedentary lifestyle, to reduce the risk for global impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.