Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38941472›Full record

ReviewScience advances2024

Paleolithic eyed needles and the evolution of dress.

Ian Gilligan, Francesco d'Errico, Luc Doyon, Wei Wang, Yaroslav V Kuzmin

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ian GilliganSchool of Humanities, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2339-6573
Francesco d'ErricoUniversité de Bordeaux, CNRS, MCC, PACEA, UMR5199, Pessac 33615, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2422-3079
Luc DoyonUniversité de Bordeaux, CNRS, MCC, PACEA, UMR5199, Pessac 33615, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7163-6186
Wei WangInstitute of Cultural Heritage, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5118-7093
Yaroslav V KuzminSobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4512-2269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eyed needles are among the most iconic of Paleolithic artifacts, traditionally seen as rare indicators of prehistoric clothing, particularly tailoring. However, recent finds across Africa and Eurasia show that other technologies like bone awls also facilitated the creation of fitted garments. Nonetheless, the advent of delicate eyed needles suggests a demand for more refined, efficient sewing. This refinement may signify two major developments: the emergence of underwear in layered garment assemblages, and/or a transition in adornment from body modification to decorating clothes, as humans covered themselves more completely for thermal protection. Archaeological evidence for underwear is limited, but the Upper Paleolithic saw an increase in personal ornaments, some sewn onto clothing. Eyed needles may mark a pivotal shift as clothes acquired the social functions of dress, decoupling clothing from climate and ensuring its enduring presence.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyClothingHistory, AncientHumans

Identifiers

PMID38941472
PMCPMC11212769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.