Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38941361›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2024

Phage-induced efflux down-regulation boosts antibiotic efficacy.

Samuel Kraus, Megan L Fletcher, Urszula Łapińska, Krina Chawla, Evan Baker, Erin L Attrill, Paul O'Neill, Audrey Farbos, Aaron Jeffries, Edouard E Galyov and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Giving Antibiotics a Second Chance: Evolutionary Trade-Offs and Phage-Driven Restoration of Antibiotic Susceptibility.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Copper-driven mutualism ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Phage provoke growth delays and SOS response induction despite CRISPR-Cas protection.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Samuel KrausLiving Systems Institute and Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
Megan L FletcherLiving Systems Institute and Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
Urszula ŁapińskaLiving Systems Institute and Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
Krina ChawlaLiving Systems Institute and Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
Evan BakerDepartment of Mathematics and Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
Erin L AttrillLiving Systems Institute and Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
Paul O'NeillBiosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4QD, United Kingdom.
Audrey FarbosBiosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4QD, United Kingdom.
Aaron JeffriesBiosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4QD, United Kingdom.
Edouard E GalyovDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Sunee KorbsrisateDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok Thailand.
Kay B BarnesDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.
Sarah V HardingDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.
Krasimira Tsaneva-AtanasovaDepartment of Mathematics and Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
Mark A T BlaskovichCentre for Superbug Solutions, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Stefano PagliaraLiving Systems Institute and Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9796-1956

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interactions between a virus and its host vary in space and time and are affected by the presence of molecules that alter the physiology of either the host or the virus. Determining the molecular mechanisms at the basis of these interactions is paramount for predicting the fate of bacterial and phage populations and for designing rational phage-antibiotic therapies. We study the interactions between stationary phase Burkholderia thailandensis and the phage ΦBp-AMP1. Although heterogeneous genetic resistance to phage rapidly emerges in B. thailandensis, the presence of phage enhances the efficacy of three major antibiotic classes, the quinolones, the beta-lactams and the tetracyclines, but antagonizes tetrahydrofolate synthesis inhibitors. We discovered that enhanced antibiotic efficacy is facilitated by reduced antibiotic efflux in the presence of phage. This new phage-antibiotic therapy allows for eradication of stationary phase bacteria, whilst requiring reduced antibiotic concentrations, which is crucial for treating infections in sites where it is difficult to achieve high antibiotic concentrations.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriophagesBurkholderiaDown-RegulationAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID38941361
PMCPMC11239113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.