Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38941353›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Challenges of biomedical research collaboration in India: Perceptions of Indian and international researchers.

Vaishali Deshmukh, Tanuja Agarwala, Archisman Mohapatra, Sanjiv Kumar, Sushma Acquilla, Manoja K Das, Rajib Dasgupta, Sanjay Chaturvedi, Subrata Sinha, Sharmila Mukherjee and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Vaishali DeshmukhDepartment of Research, The INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
Tanuja AgarwalaFaculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Archisman MohapatraDepartment of Research, The INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
Sanjiv KumarDepartment of Research, The INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.
Sushma AcquillaFaculty of Public Health of Royal College of Physicians, Hon Snr lecturer Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Manoja K DasDepartment of Research, The INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8559-5837
Rajib DasguptaCentre for Social Medicine and Community Health, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
Sanjay ChaturvediDepartment of Community Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Subrata SinhaDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sharmila MukherjeeDepartment of Paediatrics, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Mubashir AngolkarDepartment of Public Health, KLE Academy of Higher Education, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Naveet WigDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Navneet K DhamijaDepartment of Training, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India.
Narendra Kumar AroraDepartment of Research, The INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3008-8616
INCLEN Leadership Study Group

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical research collaborations are to be contextualized in the larger global health agenda which also opens up new information pathways, expands research networks, and brings additional resources. A qualitative inquiry was employed to understand the perceived benefits and challenges of research collaborations by biomedical scientists from India (Global South [GS] country) and the Global North (GN). In-depth interviews were conducted with 47 biomedical scientists from India and 06 from the GN. The data was analyzed using the grounded theory approach. Complementarity of skills and resources, access to funds, improved quality of work, an opportunity to conduct multi-centric studies, development of collaborative networks, better and larger number of publications, mutual learning, opportunity to work with credible researchers, address common interests, leverage interpersonal and trusted relationships and larger societal good were some of the critical factors for eagerness of participants in joint scientific endeavors. However, the challenging aspects of dissent and disagreements were the power imbalance between the collaborators, the development of a trust deficit, and local administrative issues. The challenges reported in the current publication, also echoed in several previous publications can be surmounted and negotiated amicably when the rules of the game, law of the land, sharing of the credits, and interest of the collaborating parties are addressed and agreed up in a fair and just manner before the start of the collaboration. Overall biomedical partnerships are complex collaborations with its challenges, the processes are dynamic and outcomes are emergent. This requires constant and proactive evolution of the preparation, implementation and sustainability of the collaborative efforts be it national or international.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCooperative BehaviorResearch PersonnelFemaleHumansIndiaInternational CooperationMale

Identifiers

PMID38941353
PMCPMC11213314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.