Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38941342›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Implementing a social prescribing program in primary care units in Portugal: A qualitative study exploring enablers, barriers and lessons learned from the perspectives of stakeholders involved in the program implementation.

Louíse Viecili Hoffmeister, Ana Gama, Barbara Gonçalves, Cristiano Figueiredo, João V Cordeiro, Marie Polley, Gisela Souto de Moura, Sónia Dias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Louíse Viecili HoffmeisterNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, CHRC, REAL, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8858-5693
Ana GamaNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, CHRC, REAL, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Barbara GonçalvesNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, CHRC, REAL, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cristiano FigueiredoNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, CHRC, REAL, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4417-673X
João V CordeiroNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, CHRC, REAL, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Marie PolleyMeaningful Measures Ltd., Bristol, United Kingdom.
Gisela Souto de MouraSchool of Nursing, Federal do Rio Grande do Sul University, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Sónia DiasNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, CHRC, REAL, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social prescribing (SP) is a promising intersectoral strategy of integrated and person-centered care that can improve individual health and well-being by going beyond medical treatment, potentially reducing overall disease burden on health system. SP addresses health and social determinants of health by linking patients to community responses, i.e. services and initiatives fostering social interaction, physical activity and creativity, among other health-promoting aspects, provided by local public, private, and non-profit entities. There is limited research on the implementation processes of SP beyond the UK, hindering improvement and scale-up. This study aims to identify enablers and barriers of implementation of an SP program conducted in Portugal. A participatory and qualitative approach was used to assess the implementation of an SP program in health units. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with family doctors, social workers and representatives of community partners who participated in SP implementation. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to conduct thematic analysis. The main enablers of SP implementation included its recognition as an evolution towards a holistic model of health, the personal characteristics of professionals as being proactive, motivated, and concerned with social determinants of health, and the communication strategy used to engage the stakeholders. Perceived challenges included raising users' awareness of SP and ensuring intervention adherence. Lack of preparedness for intersectoral working processes, including insufficient communication channels, limited community responses and the need for a more systematic collection of data on activities adherence and progress were also highlighted as barriers to SP implementation. SP implementation seems simple, but the results show that in practice, we are facing a complex intervention with multiple stakeholders, diverse community responses and factors influencing project success. A deeper understanding of SP specificities, local context, enablers, and barriers is vital to develop strategies for improvement and successful implementation, ensuring scalability and sustainability.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareQualitative ResearchFemaleHumansMalePortugalSocial Determinants of HealthStakeholder Participation

Identifiers

PMID38941342
PMCPMC11213352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.