Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38941330›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Quality considerations and major pitfalls for high throughput DNA-based newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency and spinal muscular atrophy.

Jessica Bzdok, Ludwig Czibere, Siegfried Burggraf, Olfert Landt, Esther M Maier, Wulf Röschinger, Michael H Albert, Sebastian Hegert, Nils Janzen, Marc Becker and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessica BzdokDepartment of Operative/Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Pedodontics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-7750-8808
Ludwig CzibereLaboratory Becker MVZ GbR, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7508-5841
Siegfried BurggrafLaboratory Becker MVZ GbR, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2116-0156
Olfert LandtTIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Esther M MaierLaboratory Becker MVZ GbR, Munich, Germany.
Wulf RöschingerLaboratory Becker MVZ GbR, Munich, Germany.
Michael H AlbertDepartment of Paediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian HegertScreening-Labor Hannover, Hanover, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-1616-7540
Nils JanzenScreening-Labor Hannover, Hanover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2313-3311
Marc BeckerDepartment of Operative/Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Pedodontics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Jürgen DurnerDepartment of Operative/Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Pedodontics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany newborn screening programs worldwide have introduced screening for diseases using DNA extracted from dried blood spots (DBS). In Germany, DNA-based assays are currently used to screen for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and sickle cell disease (SCD).

methodsThis study analysed the impact of pre-analytic DNA carry-over in sample preparation on the outcome of DNA-based newborn screening for SCID and SMA and compared the efficacy of rapid extraction versus automated protocols. Additionally, the distribution of T cell receptor excision circles (TREC) on DBS cards, commonly used for routine newborn screening, was determined.

resultsContaminations from the punching procedure were detected in the SCID and SMA assays in all experimental setups tested. However, a careful evaluation of a cut-off allowed for a clear separation of true positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifications. Our rapid in-house extraction protocol produced similar amounts compared to automated commercial systems. Therefore, it can be used for reliable DNA-based screening. Additionally, the amount of extracted DNA significantly differs depending on the location of punching within a DBS.

conclusionsNewborn screening for SMA and SCID can be performed reliably. It is crucial to ensure that affected newborns are not overlooked. Therefore a carefully consideration of potential contaminating factors and the definition of appropriate cut-offs to minimise the risk of false results are of special concern. It is also important to note that the location of punching plays a pivotal role, and therefore an exact quantification of TREC numbers per μl may not be reliable and should therefore be avoided.

Indexed as

DNAMuscular Atrophy, SpinalNeonatal ScreeningSevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyDried Blood Spot TestingHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansInfant, NewbornPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA

Identifiers

PMID38941330
PMCPMC11213327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.