Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38941289›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Differential methylation region detection via an array-adaptive normalized kernel-weighted model.

Daniel Alhassan, Gayla R Olbricht, Akim Adekpedjou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel AlhassanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0944-5818
Gayla R OlbrichtDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, United States of America.
Akim AdekpedjouDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A differentially methylated region (DMR) is a genomic region that has significantly different methylation patterns between biological conditions. Identifying DMRs between different biological conditions is critical for developing disease biomarkers. Although methods for detecting DMRs in microarray data have been introduced, developing methods with high precision, recall, and accuracy in determining the true length of DMRs remains a challenge. In this study, we propose a normalized kernel-weighted model to account for similar methylation profiles using the relative probe distance from "nearby" CpG sites. We also extend this model by proposing an array-adaptive version in attempt to account for the differences in probe spacing between Illumina's Infinium 450K and EPIC bead array respectively. We also study the asymptotic results of our proposed statistic. We compare our approach with a popular DMR detection method via simulation studies under large and small treatment effect settings. We also discuss the susceptibility of our method in detecting the true length of the DMRs under these two settings. Lastly, we demonstrate the biological usefulness of our method when combined with pathway analysis methods on oral cancer data. We have created an R package called idDMR, downloadable from GitHub repository with link: https://github.com/DanielAlhassan/idDMR, that allows for the convenient implementation of our array-adaptive DMR method.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsDNA MethylationAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansMouth NeoplasmsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSoftware

Identifiers

PMID38941289
PMCPMC11213316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.