ArticlePloS one2024
Differential methylation region detection via an array-adaptive normalized kernel-weighted model.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA methylation biomarkers-based pan-cancer classifier: predictive modeling for cancer classification.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- ReMeDy: A Flexible Statistical Framework For Region-based Detection of DNA Methylation Dysregulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Recent advances on gene-related DNA methylation in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment: a clinical perspective.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A differentially methylated region (DMR) is a genomic region that has significantly different methylation patterns between biological conditions. Identifying DMRs between different biological conditions is critical for developing disease biomarkers. Although methods for detecting DMRs in microarray data have been introduced, developing methods with high precision, recall, and accuracy in determining the true length of DMRs remains a challenge. In this study, we propose a normalized kernel-weighted model to account for similar methylation profiles using the relative probe distance from "nearby" CpG sites. We also extend this model by proposing an array-adaptive version in attempt to account for the differences in probe spacing between Illumina's Infinium 450K and EPIC bead array respectively. We also study the asymptotic results of our proposed statistic. We compare our approach with a popular DMR detection method via simulation studies under large and small treatment effect settings. We also discuss the susceptibility of our method in detecting the true length of the DMRs under these two settings. Lastly, we demonstrate the biological usefulness of our method when combined with pathway analysis methods on oral cancer data. We have created an R package called idDMR, downloadable from GitHub repository with link: https://github.com/DanielAlhassan/idDMR, that allows for the convenient implementation of our array-adaptive DMR method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.