Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38941277›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

A computational account of transsaccadic attentional allocation based on visual gain fields.

William J Harrison, Imogen Stead, Thomas S A Wallis, Peter J Bex, Jason B Mattingley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A computational account of transsaccadic attentional allocation based on visual gain fields.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William J HarrisonPsychology, School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6408-0359
Imogen SteadQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6543-8829
Thomas S A WallisCentre for Cognitive Science and Institute of Psychology, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt 64283, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7431-4852
Peter J BexDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115.
Jason B MattingleyQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0929-9216

Funding

ARBi - Assessment and Rehabilitation of Binocular Sensorimotor DisordersR01EY032162 · NEI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI Peter John Bex, David G HUNTER · 2022 to 2026
$2.4M
Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) DE190100136DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1091257DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) GNT2010141NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordination of goal-directed behavior depends on the brain's ability to recover the locations of relevant objects in the world. In humans, the visual system encodes the spatial organization of sensory inputs, but neurons in early visual areas map objects according to their retinal positions, rather than where they are in the world. How the brain computes world-referenced spatial information across eye movements has been widely researched and debated. Here, we tested whether shifts of covert attention are sufficiently precise in space and time to track an object's real-world location across eye movements. We found that observers' attentional selectivity is remarkably precise and is barely perturbed by the execution of saccades. Inspired by recent neurophysiological discoveries, we developed an observer model that rapidly estimates the real-world locations of objects and allocates attention within this reference frame. The model recapitulates the human data and provides a parsimonious explanation for previously reported phenomena in which observers allocate attention to task-irrelevant locations across eye movements. Our findings reveal that visual attention operates in real-world coordinates, which can be computed rapidly at the earliest stages of cortical processing.

Indexed as

AttentionSaccadesAdultFemaleHumansMaleModels, NeurologicalPhotic StimulationVisual FieldsVisual Perceptionactive visionclassification imagesgain fieldsobserver modelsvisual stability

Identifiers

PMID38941277
PMCPMC11228487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.