Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38941132›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Assessing Functional Capacity in Directly and Remotely Monitored Home-Based Settings in Individuals With Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Protocol for a Multinational Validation Study.

Alec Bass, Sarah Géphine, Mickaël Martin, Marianne Belley, Manon Robic, Claudine Fabre, Jean-Marie Grosbois, Geneviève Dion, Didier Saey, Arnaud Chambellan and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06447831 (Assessing Functional Capacity in Directly and Remotely Monitored Home-based Settings), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06447831 completednot on this map

Assessing Functional Capacity in Directly and Remotely Monitored Home-based Settings: A Protocol for a Multinational Validation Study in Individuals With Chronic Respiratory Diseases

TypeobservationalSponsorLaval UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled89ConditionsCOPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Interstitial Lung Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alec BassCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CR-IUCPQ), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3083-341X
Sarah GéphineFormAction Santé, Pérenchies, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0801-7416
Mickaël MartinCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CR-IUCPQ), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7307-4463
Marianne BelleyCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CR-IUCPQ), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-1350-5189
Manon RobicUniversité of Lille, Université de Artois, Université du Littoral Cote d'Opale, ULR 7369 - URePSSS - Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport Santé Société, Lille, France.ORCID 0009-0004-4512-8603
Claudine FabreUniversité of Lille, Université de Artois, Université du Littoral Cote d'Opale, ULR 7369 - URePSSS - Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport Santé Société, Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0441-9090
Jean-Marie GrosboisFormAction Santé, Pérenchies, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5093-7454
Geneviève DionCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CR-IUCPQ), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2555-1525
Didier SaeyCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CR-IUCPQ), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0174-0644
Arnaud ChambellanService de Pneumologie, Hôpital Saint-Philibert, Université Catholique de Lille, Lomme, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7860-1880
François MaltaisCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CR-IUCPQ), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6809-4651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary rehabilitation is widely recommended to improve functional status and as secondary and tertiary prevention in individuals with chronic pulmonary diseases. Unfortunately, access to timely and appropriate rehabilitation remains limited. To help close this inaccessibility gap, telerehabilitation has been proposed. However, exercise testing is necessary for effective and safe exercise prescription. Current gold-standard tests, such as maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), are poorly adapted to home-based or telerehabilitation settings. This was an obstacle to the continuity of services during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is essential to validate tests adapted to these new realities, such as the 6-minute stepper test (6MST). This test, strongly inspired by 6MWT, consists of taking as many steps as possible on a "stepper" for 6 minutes.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the metrological qualities of 6MST by (1) establishing concurrent validity and agreement between the 6MST and CPET, as well as with the 6MWT; (2) determining test-retest reliability in a home-based setting with direct and remote (videoconferencing) monitoring; and (3) documenting adverse events and participant perspectives when performing the 6MST in home-based settings.

methodsThree centers (Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec in Québec, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille in France, and FormAction Santé in France) will be involved in this multinational project, which is divided into 2 studies. For study 1 (objective 1), 30 participants (Québec, n=15; France, n=15) will be recruited. Two laboratory visits will be performed to assess anthropometric data, pulmonary function, and the 3 exercise tolerance tests (CPET, 6MWT, and 6MST). Concurrent validity (paired sample t tests and Pearson correlations) and agreement (Bland-Altman plots with 95% agreement limits) will be evaluated. For study 2 (objectives 2 and 3), 52 participants (Québec, n=26; France, n=26) will be recruited. Following a familiarization trial (trial 1), the 6MST will be conducted on 2 separate occasions (trials 2 and 3), once under direct supervision and once under remote supervision, in a randomized order. Paired sample t test, Bland-Altman plots, and intraclass correlations will be used to compare trials 2 and 3. A semistructured interview will be conducted after the third trial to collect participants' perspectives.

resultsEthical approval was received for this project (October 12, 2023, in Québec and September 25, 2023, in France) and the first participant was recruited in February 2024.

conclusionsThis study innovates by validating a new clinical test necessary for the development and implementation of new models of rehabilitation adapted to home and telerehabilitation contexts. This study also aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals by contributing to augmenting health care service delivery (goal 3) and reducing health care access inequalities (goal 11).

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06447831; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06447831. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/57404.

Indexed as

Exercise TestAdultChronic DiseaseCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsTelemedicineTelerehabilitationWalk Testchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCOPDexercise capacity testinterstitial lung diseasesphysiotherapyrehabilitationstepper testtelerehabilitationvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID38941132
PMCPMC11245655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.