ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
Prediction of Bone Remodeling in Rat Caudal Vertebrae Based on Fluid-Solid Coupling Simulation.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gradient mechanical environments modulate intra-osteonal fluid flow: a three-dimensional finite element study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Numerical Simulation of Fluid Shear Stress Distribution in Microcracks of Trabecular Bone.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Some previous researches have demonstrated that appropriate mechanical stimulation can enhance bone formation. However, most studies have employed the strain energy density (SED) method for predicting bone remodeling, with only a few considering the potential impact of wall fluid shear stress (FSS) on this process. To bridge this gap, the current study compared the prediction of bone formation and resorption via SED and wall FSS by using fluid-solid coupling numerical simulation. Specifically, 8-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to stretching of the eighth caudal vertebra using a custom-made device. Based on micro-computed tomography images, a three-dimensional model integrating fluid-solid coupling was created to represent compact bone, cancellous bone, and bone marrow. The animals were grouped into control, 1 Hz, and 10 Hz categories, wherein a tensile displacement load of 1000 με was applied to the loading end. The results revealed that SED values tended to increase with elevated porosity, whereas wall FSS values decreased it. Notably, wall FSS demonstrated the higher predictive accuracy for cancellous bone resorption than SED. These findings support the notion that fluid flow within cancellous bone spaces can significantly impact bone resorption. Therefore, the findings of this study contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the role of wall FSS in bone remodeling, providing a theoretical support for the dynamic evolution of bone structures under mechanical stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38941057What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.