ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Brief Report: Rural-Urban Differences in Disability Prevalence, Healthcare Services Utilization, and Participation in Special Education.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of medical students regarding syphilis-related stigma.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research has found that rural children are more likely to be disabled but are less likely to receive care. Both rural and disabled children were significantly impacted by the pandemic, particularly in terms of service utilization. Therefore, this study seeks to identify rural-urban differences in the prevalence of various disability indicators and in the receipt of educational and healthcare services. Data from 12,828 children aged 2-17 who participated in the 2021-2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) was used to examine rural-urban differences in three different disability indicators and in education and health services utilization. Disability indicators included the Washington Group Short Set Composite Disability Indicator, a developmental disability indicator, and a neurodivergence indicator. Bivariate analysis, via Rao-Scott chi-square tests, was used to examine rural-urban disparities. Compared to their urban counterparts, rural children were more likely to have a positive Washington Group Short Set Composite Disability Indicator (14.3% vs. 10.6%) and neurodivergence indicator (17Ð.3% vs. 14.1%). Rural children with disabilities were more likely to have received prescription medication for behavioral, mental, or emotional health or concentration in the past year than urban children (34.2% vs. 25.9%). There was no rural-urban difference in the prevalence of developmental disabilities or other forms of health care use and special education participation. This report highlights the need for further investigation into underlying causes of rural-urban disparities in the prevalence of disabilities, as well as the need for continued support for programs and policies designed to support rural children with disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38941047What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.