Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38940978›Full record

SynthesisCommunity mental health journal2024

Who Benefits from Acute Psychiatric Home Treatment? A Systematic Review.

Vera Bergamaschi, Felix Baumann, Ingeborg Warnke, Salvatore Corbisiero, Fabian Ludwig, Andreas Riedel, Kerstin Gabriel-Felleiter, Stefanie J Schmidt

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Community mental health journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vera BergamaschiInstitue of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. vera.bergamaschi@unibe.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-6042-7792
Felix BaumannInstitue of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3437-859X
Ingeborg WarnkeLuzerner Psychiatrie, Voltastrasse 42, 6005, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Salvatore CorbisieroLuzerner Psychiatrie, Voltastrasse 42, 6005, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Fabian LudwigLuzerner Psychiatrie, Voltastrasse 42, 6005, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Andreas RiedelLuzerner Psychiatrie, Voltastrasse 42, 6005, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Kerstin Gabriel-FelleiterLuzerner Psychiatrie, Voltastrasse 42, 6005, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Stefanie J SchmidtInstitue of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home treatment (HT) treats patients in an acute crisis through an interdisciplinary team with daily appointments for a short treatment period. The effectiveness of HT has already been confirmed. However, only few studies addressed specific patient characteristics associated outcome of treatment. This study aimed to identify patient characteristics associated with successful outcomes of HT. A systematic literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 13 studies were included in the systematic review. Being employed, having a regular income, having an anxiety disorder and family involvement were associated with a successful treatment outcome in HT. High symptom severity and former hospital admissions were associated with unsuccessful treatment outcome in HT in the selected studies. HT seems to be especially beneficial for patients with paid employment or regular income, patients with anxiety disorders, and patients with familial or other social support.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesMental DisordersHumansTreatment OutcomeClinical ChangesHome TreatmentHospital AdmissionPredictorSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID38940978
PMCPMC11408559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.