Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38940913›Full record

ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Craniocervical dissection].

Lisa Goerens

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lisa GoerensKlinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str. 100, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland. lisa.goerens@uks.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueCraniocervical dissections are among the most common causes of stroke in people aged under 50 years, which is why it is essential to clarify, diagnose, and treat them as quickly as possible. Dissections usually occur spontaneously due to bleeding into the vessel wall. The affected segments are usually the motion segments of the internal cerebral artery (C1 segment) and the vertebral artery (V3 segment). Clinically, there is head and/or neck pain and neurologic symptoms, which can vary according to the localization of the dissection. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Pathognomonic is the detection of an intramural hematoma due to bleeding into the vessel wall. This can best be detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in native, fat-saturated T1 sequences (black-blood sequence). In addition, contrast-enhanced angiography should be performed using MRI or, alternatively, computed tomography (CT). As there is an increased risk of embolic or hemodynamically induced strokes, prophylactic treatment should be initiated immediately; it remains a case-by-case decision whether antiplatelet agents or oral anticoagulants are chosen for this purpose.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery, Internal, DissectionVertebral Artery DissectionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedInternal carotid arteryMagnetic resonance imagingStrokeVascular imagingVertebral artery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.