Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38940907›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2024

Imaging approach to pediatric calvarial bulges.

Emily C M Hughes, Daniel G Rosenbaum, Helen M Branson, Makabongwe Tshuma, Eman Marie, Cassidy S Frayn, Heena Rajani, Samantha K Gerrie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily C M HughesDepartment of Radiology, BC Children's Hospital, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada. emilyhughes2@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8293-3343
Daniel G RosenbaumDepartment of Radiology, BC Children's Hospital, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada.
Helen M BransonDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Makabongwe TshumaDepartment of Radiology, BC Children's Hospital, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada.
Eman MarieDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, McMaster Children's Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Cassidy S FraynDepartment of Radiology, BC Children's Hospital, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada.
Heena RajaniDepartment of Radiology, BC Children's Hospital, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada.
Samantha K GerrieDepartment of Radiology, BC Children's Hospital, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Palpable calvarial lesions in children may require multi-modality imaging for adequate characterization due to non-specific clinical features. Causative lesions range from benign incidental lesions to highly aggressive pathologies. While tissue sampling may be required for some lesions, others have a typical imaging appearance, and an informed imaging approach facilitates diagnosis. This review illustrates imaging findings of common and clinically important focal pediatric calvarial bulges to aid the radiologist in narrowing the differential diagnosis and directing appropriate referral. We focus on birth-related lesions, congenital abnormalities, and modeling disturbances (i.e., those that produce a change in calvarial contour early in development), normal variants, and neoplastic lesions with their mimics.

Indexed as

SkullChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTomography, X-Ray ComputedCausative lesionsPalpable calvarial lesionsPediatric calvarial bulges

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.