Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38940846›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2024

An alternative approach of TUNEL assay to specifically characterize DNA fragmentation in cell model systems.

Flores Naselli, Paola Sofia Cardinale, Sara Volpes, Chiara Martino, Ilenia Cruciata, Rossella Valenti, Claudio Luparello, Fabio Caradonna, Roberto Chiarelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Synthesis, in-vitro,Toxicology research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. In focus in HCB.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Flores Naselli *Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Building 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8075-0642
Paola Sofia Cardinale *Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Building 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8971-266X
Sara VolpesDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Building 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9288-9859
Chiara MartinoDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Building 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-9329
Ilenia CruciataDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Building 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-7270
Rossella ValentiDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Building 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy.
Claudio LuparelloDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Building 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9821-5891
Fabio CaradonnaDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Building 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy. fabio.caradonna@unipa.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7659-7312
Roberto ChiarelliDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Building 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8381-3389

Funding

National Biodiversity Future Center code CN00000033, CUP B73C22000790001Università degli Studi di Palermo FFR 2021-2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage is one of the most important effects induced by chemical agents. We report a comparative analysis of DNA fragmentation on three different cell lines using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay, generally applied to detect apoptosis. Our approach combines cytogenetic techniques and investigation in detached cellular structures, recovered from the culture medium with the aim to compare the DNA fragmentation of three different cell line even beyond the cells adherent to substrate. Consequently, we detect any fragmentation points on single chromosomes, whole nuclei and other cellular structures. Cells were exposed to resveratrol (RSV) and doxorubicin (Doxo), in single and combined treatments. Control and treated astrocytes showed DNA damage in condensed nuclei and detached structures. Caco-2 cells showed fragmented DNA only after Doxo-treatment, while controls showed fragmented chromosomes, indicating DNA damage in replicating cells. MDA-MB-231 cells showed nuclear condensation and DNA fragmentation above all after RSV-treatment and related to detached structures. This model proved to perform a grading of genomic instability (GI). Astrocytes show a hybrid level of GI. Caco-2 cells showed fragmented metaphase chromosomes, proving that the DNA damage was transmitted to the daughter cells probably due to an absence of DNA repair mechanisms. Instead, MDA-MB-231 cells showed few or no fragmented metaphase, suggesting a probable activation of DNA repair mechanisms. By applying this alternative approach of TUNEL test, we obtained data that can more specifically characterize DNA fragmentation for a suitable application in various fields.

Indexed as

DNA FragmentationIn Situ Nick-End LabelingResveratrolAnimalsApoptosisCaco-2 CellsDoxorubicinHumansDoxorubicinResveratrolDNA damageDNA fragmentationGenomic instabilityPyknosisSingle chromosomes fragmentation

Identifiers

PMID38940846
PMCPMC11393043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.