Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38940757›Full record

Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2024

Comparison of Changes in Retinal Vascular Density and Thickness After Using Low-Level Red Light and 0.01% Atropine in Premyopic Children.

Lili Shang, Shasha Gao, Weiqun Wang, Minghang Chang, Nana Ma, Congcong Huang, Shiao Yu, Ming Wang, Aicun Fu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identifying and Managing Pre-Myopia: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lili ShangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shasha GaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Weiqun WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Minghang ChangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Nana MaDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Congcong HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shiao YuDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ming WangDepartment of Optometry, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Aicun FuDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare changes in superficial retinal vascular density (SRVD), deep retinal vascular density (DRVD), and retinal thickness (RT) of the macular zone after repeated low-level red light (RLRL) and 0.01% atropine exposure in premyopic schoolchildren. Methods: Prospective randomized trial. Sixty-nine schoolchildren with cycloplegic refraction >-0.75 D and ≤0.50 D were randomly assigned to RLRL and 0.01% atropine groups. SRVD, DRVD, and RT were measured using swept-source optical coherence tomography at baseline and six months. The macular zone was divided into three concentric rings (fovea, parafovea, and perifovea) using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Results: After six months, the whole, parafoveal, and perifoveal SRVD significantly increased in the two groups (all P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analyses showed that none of these changes varied significantly between the two groups (all P > 0.05), whereas foveal SRVD remained stable in both groups (all P > 0.05). In the RLRL group, the whole and perifoveal DRVD increased significantly (all P < 0.05), whereas no statistical difference was observed in the foveal and parafoveal DRVD. DRVD remained stable in the 0.01% atropine group (all P > 0.05). No significant differences were observed in RT changes between the two groups (all P > 0.05). In comparison, there were no significant changes in SRVD, DRVD, or RT after six months in the placebo group in our previous study. Conclusions: SRVD increased similarly in the RLRL and 0.01% atropine groups, whereas DRVD increased only in the former group. There were no significant RT changes in either group after six months of treatment in premyopic schoolchildren. Translational Relevance: This research observed the effects of low-level red light and 0.01% atropine on retinal vasculature, offering valuable insights into myopia progression prevention.

Indexed as

AtropineMydriaticsRetinal VesselsTomography, Optical CoherenceChildFemaleHumansMaleMicrovascular DensityMyopiaOphthalmic SolutionsPhototherapyProspective StudiesRed LightAtropineMydriaticsOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID38940757
PMCPMC11216272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.