Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38940738›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2024

Suppressing the Maintenance of Information in Working Memory Alters Long-term Memory Traces.

Zachary H Bretton, Hyojeong Kim, Marie T Banich, Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Maintenance suppression enhances subsequent associative learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Decoding Mindfulness With Multivariate Predictive Models.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zachary H BrettonUniversity of Texas at Austin.ORCID 0000-0002-4634-1842
Hyojeong KimUniversity of Texas at Austin.
Marie T BanichUniversity of Colorado.
Jarrod A Lewis-PeacockUniversity of Texas at Austin.ORCID 0000-0002-9918-465X

Funding

Neural and Cognitive Mechanisms for Removing Emotional Information from Working MemoryR01MH129042 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BANICH, MARIE T, LEWIS-PEACOCK, JARROD A · 2022 to 2025
$3.0M
Training in Learning and MemoryT32MH106454 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRESTON, ALISON R · 2015 to 2025
$2.1M
Biasing the Forgetting of Visual MemoriesR01EY028746 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI LEWIS-PEACOCK, JARROD A · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Removing and Manipulating Emotional Information in Working Memory: Cognitive and Neural RepresentationsR56MH125642 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BANICH, MARIE T, LEWIS-PEACOCK, JARROD A · 2021 to 2021
$770k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028746NEI NIH HHS R01EY028746NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129042NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH125642NIMH NIH HHS R56MH125642NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH106454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensory recruitment hypothesis conceptualizes information in working memory as being activated representations of information in long-term memory. Accordingly, changes made to an item in working memory would be expected to influence its subsequent retention. Here, we tested the hypothesis that suppressing information from working memory, which can reduce short-term access to that information, may also alter its long-term neural representation. We obtained fMRI data (n = 25; 13 female / 12 male participants) while participants completed a working memory removal task with scene images as stimuli, followed by a final surprise recognition test of the examined items. We applied a multivariate pattern analysis to the data to quantify the engagement of suppression on each trial, to track the contents of working memory during suppression, and to assess representational changes afterward. Our analysis confirms previous reports that suppression of information in working memory involves focused attention to target and remove unwanted information. Furthermore, our findings provide new evidence that even a single dose of suppression of an item in working memory can (if engaged with sufficient strength) produce lasting changes in its neural representation, particularly weakening the unique, item-specific features, which leads to forgetting. Our study sheds light on the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the suppression of unwanted thoughts and highlights the dynamic interplay between working memory and long-term memory.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMemory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermAdolescentAdultAttentionBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleRecognition, PsychologyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38940738
PMCPMC11383534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.