Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38940522›Full record

ArticlemSystems2024

zDB: bacterial comparative genomics made easy.

Bastian Marquis, Trestan Pillonel, Alessia Carrara, Claire Bertelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative Genomic Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bastian MarquisLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1507-3491
Trestan PillonelLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alessia CarraraLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Claire BertelliLausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0550-8981

Funding

Jurg Tschopp MD-PhD scholarshipNCCR microbiomes, Swiss National Science Foundation 180575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis and comparison of genomes rely on different tools for tasks such as annotation, orthology prediction, and phylogenetic inference. Most tools are specialized for a single task, and additional efforts are necessary to integrate and visualize the results. To fill this gap, we developed zDB, an application integrating a Nextflow analysis pipeline and a Python visualization platform built on the Django framework. The application is available on GitHub (https://github.com/metagenlab/zDB) and from the bioconda channel. Starting from annotated Genbank files, zDB identifies orthologs and infers a phylogeny for each orthogroup. A species phylogeny is also constructed from shared single-copy orthologs. The results can be enriched with Pfam protein domain prediction, Cluster of Orthologs Genes and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes annotations, and Swissprot homologs. The web application allows searching for specific genes or annotations, running Blast queries, and comparing genomic regions and whole genomes. The metabolic capacities of organisms can be compared at either the module or pathway levels. Finally, users can run queries to examine the conservation of specific genes or annotations across a chosen subset of genomes and display the results as a list of genes, Venn diagram, or heatmaps. Those features make zDB useful for both bioinformaticians and researchers more accustomed to laboratory research.IMPORTANCEGenome comparison and analysis rely on many independent tools, leaving to scientists the burden to integrate and visualize their results for interpretation. To alleviate this burden, we have built zDB, a comparative genomics tool that includes both an analysis pipeline and a visualization platform. The analysis pipeline automates gene annotation, orthology prediction, and phylogenetic inference, while the visualization platform allows scientists to easily explore the results in a web browser. Among other features, the interface allows users to visually compare whole genomes and targeted regions, assess the conservation of genes or metabolic pathways, perform Blast searches, or look for specific annotations. Altogether, this tool will be useful for a broad range of applications in comparative studies between two and hundred genomes. Furthermore, it is designed to allow sharing of data sets easily at a local or international scale, thereby supporting exploratory analyses for non-bioinformaticians on the genome of their favorite organisms.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsPhylogenySoftwareBacteriaComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticMolecular Sequence Annotationcomparative genomicsgenome visualizationmicrobial genomics

Identifiers

PMID38940522
PMCPMC11264898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.