ArticlemSystems2024
Augmenting bacterial similarity measures using a graph-based genome representation.
Article in mSystems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relationships between bacterial taxa are traditionally defined using 16S rRNA nucleotide similarity or average nucleotide identity. Improvements in sequencing technology provide additional pairwise information on genome sequences, which may provide valuable information on genomic relationships. Mapping orthologous gene locations between genome pairs, known as synteny, is typically implemented in the discovery of new species and has not been systematically applied to bacterial genomes. Using a data set of 378 bacterial genomes, we developed and tested a new measure of synteny similarity between a pair of genomes, which was scaled onto 16S rRNA distance using covariance matrices. Based on the input gene functions used (i.e., core, antibiotic resistance, and virulence), we observed varying topological arrangements of bacterial relationship networks by applying (i) complete linkage hierarchical clustering and (ii) K-nearest neighbor graph structures to synteny-scaled 16S data. Our metric improved clustering quality comparatively to state-of-the-art average nucleotide identity metrics while preserving clustering assignments for the highest similarity relationships. Our findings indicate that syntenic relationships provide more granular and interpretable relationships for within-genera taxa compared to pairwise similarity measures, particularly in functional contexts. IMPORTANCE: Given the prevalence and necessity of the 16S rRNA measure in bacterial identification and analysis, this additional analysis adds a functional and synteny-based layer to the identification of relatives and clustering of bacteria genomes. It is also of computational interest to model the bacterial genome as a graph structure, which presents new avenues of genomic analysis for bacteria and their closely related strains and species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.