ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Enhancing generalizability and performance in drug-target interaction identification by integrating pharmacophore and pre-trained models.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical language models for early-stage drug discovery: applications, pitfalls, and future directions.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- A Site-Aware Representation Learning Framework For Unified Molecular Interaction Modeling and Generative Design.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence to identify Bufalin as a molecular glue degrader of estrogen receptor alpha.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Developing Generalizable Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking: Challenges and Perspectives.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationIn drug discovery, it is crucial to assess the drug-target binding affinity (DTA). Although molecular docking is widely used, computational efficiency limits its application in large-scale virtual screening. Deep learning-based methods learn virtual scoring functions from labeled datasets and can quickly predict affinity. However, there are three limitations. First, existing methods only consider the atom-bond graph or one-dimensional sequence representations of compounds, ignoring the information about functional groups (pharmacophores) with specific biological activities. Second, relying on limited labeled datasets fails to learn comprehensive embedding representations of compounds and proteins, resulting in poor generalization performance in complex scenarios. Third, existing feature fusion methods cannot adequately capture contextual interaction information.
resultsTherefore, we propose a novel DTA prediction method named HeteroDTA. Specifically, a multi-view compound feature extraction module is constructed to model the atom-bond graph and pharmacophore graph. The residue concat graph and protein sequence are also utilized to model protein structure and function. Moreover, to enhance the generalization capability and reduce the dependence on task-specific labeled data, pre-trained models are utilized to initialize the atomic features of the compounds and the embedding representations of the protein sequence. A context-aware nonlinear feature fusion method is also proposed to learn interaction patterns between compounds and proteins. Experimental results on public benchmark datasets show that HeteroDTA significantly outperforms existing methods. In addition, HeteroDTA shows excellent generalization performance in cold-start experiments and superiority in the representation learning ability of drug-target pairs. Finally, the effectiveness of HeteroDTA is demonstrated in a real-world drug discovery study. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code and data are available at https://github.com/daydayupzzl/HeteroDTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.