ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Biomarker identification by interpretable maximum mean discrepancy.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationIn many biomedical applications, we are confronted with paired groups of samples, such as treated versus control. The aim is to detect discriminating features, i.e. biomarkers, based on high-dimensional (omics-) data. This problem can be phrased more generally as a two-sample problem requiring statistical significance testing to establish differences, and interpretations to identify distinguishing features. The multivariate maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) test quantifies group-level differences, whereas statistically significantly associated features are usually found by univariate feature selection. Currently, few general-purpose methods simultaneously perform multivariate feature selection and two-sample testing.
resultsWe introduce a sparse, interpretable, and optimized MMD test (SpInOpt-MMD) that enables two-sample testing and feature selection in the same experiment. SpInOpt-MMD is a versatile method and we demonstrate its application to a variety of synthetic and real-world data types including images, gene expression measurements, and text data. SpInOpt-MMD is effective in identifying relevant features in small sample sizes and outperforms other feature selection methods such as SHapley Additive exPlanations and univariate association analysis in several experiments. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code and links to our public data are available at https://github.com/BorgwardtLab/spinoptmmd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.