ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Maximum likelihood phylogeographic inference of cell motility and cell division from spatial lineage tracing data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial transcriptomics and artificial intelligence: a scoping review of emerging applications in head and neck pathology.Head and neck pathology · 2026Article
- Cell lineage tracing: Methods, applications, and challenges.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
- Maximum likelihood inference of time-scaled cell lineage trees with mixed-type missing data using LAML.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Next generation lineage tracing and its applications to unravel development.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRecently developed spatial lineage tracing technologies induce somatic mutations at specific genomic loci in a population of growing cells and then measure these mutations in the sampled cells along with the physical locations of the cells. These technologies enable high-throughput studies of developmental processes over space and time. However, these applications rely on accurate reconstruction of a spatial cell lineage tree describing both past cell divisions and cell locations. Spatial lineage trees are related to phylogeographic models that have been well-studied in the phylogenetics literature. We demonstrate that standard phylogeographic models based on Brownian motion are inadequate to describe the spatial symmetric displacement (SD) of cells during cell division.
resultsWe introduce a new model-the SD model for cell motility that includes symmetric displacements of daughter cells from the parental cell followed by independent diffusion of daughter cells. We show that this model more accurately describes the locations of cells in a real spatial lineage tracing of mouse embryonic stem cells. Combining the spatial SD model with an evolutionary model of DNA mutations, we obtain a phylogeographic model for spatial lineage tracing. Using this model, we devise a maximum likelihood framework-MOLLUSC (Maximum Likelihood Estimation Of Lineage and Location Using Single-Cell Spatial Lineage tracing Data)-to co-estimate time-resolved branch lengths, spatial diffusion rate, and mutation rate. On both simulated and real data, we show that MOLLUSC accurately estimates all parameters. In contrast, the Brownian motion model overestimates spatial diffusion rate in all test cases. In addition, the inclusion of spatial information improves accuracy of branch length estimation compared to sequence data alone. On real data, we show that spatial information has more signal than sequence data for branch length estimation, suggesting augmenting lineage tracing technologies with spatial information is useful to overcome the limitations of genome-editing in developmental systems. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The python implementation of MOLLUSC is available at https://github.com/raphael-group/MOLLUSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.