ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
BioCoder: a benchmark for bioinformatics code generation with large language models.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for genomic science: a scoping review of concepts, architectures, applications, and open challenges.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Pooled it
- Agentic genomics: From pipeline automation to autonomous validation.Cell genomics · 2026Review
- Making large language models reliable data science programming copilots for biomedical research.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Responsible Use of Large Language Models in Microbial Genomics and Bioinformatics: A Life-Science Framework for Reliability, Reproducibility, and Risk-Aware Interpretation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluating open LLMs for agentic analysis orchestration in a typical biomedical lab.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Benchmarking LLM-based agents for single-cell omics analysis.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Prompt-based bioinformatic pipeline generation for a multi-step metaviral workflow.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Accessible Reporting of Bioinformatics Analyses in Interdisciplinary Contexts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- BioAgents: Bridging the gap in bioinformatics analysis with multi-agent systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Benchmarking large language models for genomic knowledge with GeneTuring.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Benchmarking large language models for genomic knowledge with GeneTuring.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Out-of-the-box bioinformatics capabilities of large language models (LLMs).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Bridging artificial intelligence and biological sciences: a comprehensive review of large language models in bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Multiple Confabulations Found in Bioinformatics Tasks Carried Out by Several Free Large Language Models.Current genomics · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics and biomedical informatics with ChatGPT: Year one review.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- Steering veridical large language model analyses by correcting and enriching generated database queries: first steps toward ChatGPT bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Article
- Bioinformatics Illustrations Decoded by ChatGPT: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summaryPretrained large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved code generation. As these models scale up, there is an increasing need for the output to handle more intricate tasks and to be appropriately specialized to particular domains. Here, we target bioinformatics due to the amount of domain knowledge, algorithms, and data operations this discipline requires. We present BioCoder, a benchmark developed to evaluate LLMs in generating bioinformatics-specific code. BioCoder spans much of the field, covering cross-file dependencies, class declarations, and global variables. It incorporates 1026 Python functions and 1243 Java methods extracted from GitHub, along with 253 examples from the Rosalind Project, all pertaining to bioinformatics. Using topic modeling, we show that the overall coverage of the included code is representative of the full spectrum of bioinformatics calculations. BioCoder incorporates a fuzz-testing framework for evaluation. We have applied it to evaluate various models including InCoder, CodeGen, CodeGen2, SantaCoder, StarCoder, StarCoder+, InstructCodeT5+, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4. Furthermore, we fine-tuned one model (StarCoder), demonstrating that our training dataset can enhance the performance on our testing benchmark (by >15% in terms of Pass@K under certain prompt configurations and always >3%). The results highlight two key aspects of successful models: (i) Successful models accommodate a long prompt (>2600 tokens) with full context, including functional dependencies. (ii) They contain domain-specific knowledge of bioinformatics, beyond just general coding capability. This is evident from the performance gain of GPT-3.5/4 compared to the smaller models on our benchmark (50% versus up to 25%). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All datasets, benchmark, Docker images, and scripts required for testing are available at: https://github.com/gersteinlab/biocoder and https://biocoder-benchmark.github.io/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.