ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Optimal phylogenetic reconstruction of insertion and deletion events.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Algorithms to reconstruct past indels: The deletion-only parsimony problem.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- The Characterization of Ancient Methanococcales Malate Dehydrogenases Reveals That Strong Thermal Stability Prevents Unfolding Under Intense γ-Irradiation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationInsertions and deletions (indels) influence the genetic code in fundamentally distinct ways from substitutions, significantly impacting gene product structure and function. Despite their influence, the evolutionary history of indels is often neglected in phylogenetic tree inference and ancestral sequence reconstruction, hindering efforts to comprehend biological diversity determinants and engineer variants for medical and industrial applications.
resultsWe frame determining the optimal history of indel events as a single Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP) problem, across all branch points in a phylogenetic tree adhering to topological constraints, and all sites implied by a given set of aligned, extant sequences. By disentangling the impact on ancestral sequences at each branch point, this approach identifies the minimal indel events that jointly explain the diversity in sequences mapped to the tips of that tree. MIP can recover alternate optimal indel histories, if available. We evaluated MIP for indel inference on a dataset comprising 15 real phylogenetic trees associated with protein families ranging from 165 to 2000 extant sequences, and on 60 synthetic trees at comparable scales of data and reflecting realistic rates of mutation. Across relevant metrics, MIP outperformed alternative parsimony-based approaches and reported the fewest indel events, on par or below their occurrence in synthetic datasets. MIP offers a rational justification for indel patterns in extant sequences; importantly, it uniquely identifies global optima on complex protein data sets without making unrealistic assumptions of independence or evolutionary underpinnings, promising a deeper understanding of molecular evolution and aiding novel protein design. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The implementation is available via GitHub at https://github.com/santule/indelmip.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.