ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Forseti: a mechanistic and predictive model of the splicing status of scRNA-seq reads.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental and computational methods for allelic imbalance analysis from single-nucleus RNA-seq data.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Improved characterization of 3' single-cell RNA-seq libraries with paired-end avidity sequencing.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Improved characterization of single-cell RNA-seq libraries with paired-end avidity sequencing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationShort-read single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) has been used to study cellular heterogeneity, cellular fate, and transcriptional dynamics. Modeling splicing dynamics in scRNA-seq data is challenging, with inherent difficulty in even the seemingly straightforward task of elucidating the splicing status of the molecules from which sequenced fragments are drawn. This difficulty arises, in part, from the limited read length and positional biases, which substantially reduce the specificity of the sequenced fragments. As a result, the splicing status of many reads in scRNA-seq is ambiguous because of a lack of definitive evidence. We are therefore in need of methods that can recover the splicing status of ambiguous reads which, in turn, can lead to more accuracy and confidence in downstream analyses.
resultsWe develop Forseti, a predictive model to probabilistically assign a splicing status to scRNA-seq reads. Our model has two key components. First, we train a binding affinity model to assign a probability that a given transcriptomic site is used in fragment generation. Second, we fit a robust fragment length distribution model that generalizes well across datasets deriving from different species and tissue types. Forseti combines these two trained models to predict the splicing status of the molecule of origin of reads by scoring putative fragments that associate each alignment of sequenced reads with proximate potential priming sites. Using both simulated and experimental data, we show that our model can precisely predict the splicing status of many reads and identify the true gene origin of multi-gene mapped reads. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Forseti and the code used for producing the results are available at https://github.com/COMBINE-lab/forseti under a BSD 3-clause license.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.