Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38940129›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

A learned score function improves the power of mass spectrometry database search.

Varun Ananth, Justin Sanders, Melih Yilmaz, Bo Wen, Sewoong Oh, William Stafford Noble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Varun AnanthPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Justin SandersPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Melih YilmazPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Bo WenDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2261-3150
Sewoong OhPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
William Stafford NoblePaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7283-4715

Funding

National Science Foundation 2245300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationOne of the core problems in the analysis of protein tandem mass spectrometry data is the peptide assignment problem: determining, for each observed spectrum, the peptide sequence that was responsible for generating the spectrum. Two primary classes of methods are used to solve this problem: database search and de novo peptide sequencing. State-of-the-art methods for de novo sequencing use machine learning methods, whereas most database search engines use hand-designed score functions to evaluate the quality of a match between an observed spectrum and a candidate peptide from the database. We hypothesized that machine learning models for de novo sequencing implicitly learn a score function that captures the relationship between peptides and spectra, and thus may be re-purposed as a score function for database search. Because this score function is trained from massive amounts of mass spectrometry data, it could potentially outperform existing, hand-designed database search tools.

resultsTo test this hypothesis, we re-engineered Casanovo, which has been shown to provide state-of-the-art de novo sequencing capabilities, to assign scores to given peptide-spectrum pairs. We then evaluated the statistical power of this Casanovo score function, Casanovo-DB, to detect peptides on a benchmark of three mass spectrometry runs from three different species. In addition, we show that re-scoring with the Percolator post-processor benefits Casanovo-DB more than other score functions, further increasing the number of detected peptides.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinPeptidesAlgorithmsMachine LearningMass SpectrometrySequence Analysis, ProteinTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptides

Identifiers

PMID38940129
PMCPMC11211853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.