ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Orphan drug policy analysis in China.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- What Drives Public Preference for Rare Drugs Coverage in China? Insights From a Multi-Center Discrete Choice Experiment.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Article
- How to evaluate rare disease policy effectiveness based on policy modeling consistency (PMC) index model: A quantitative assessment of policy implementation in China.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Article
- Comparing disease burden of rare diseases with common medical conditions in china: evidence from a national online health survey in 2022.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Reconceiving orphan drug market exclusivity as a conditional public-law entitlement: a sustainable regulatory governance model with comparative lessons for China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of China's drug regulatory reform on access to orphan drugs: a cross-sectional study of diseases listed in the rare disease catalog.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Research on the innovation of medical expenses protection mechanism for rare disease patients in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Awareness of Duchenne muscular dystrophy among medical staff in China: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Trends, lag and characteristics of rare disease drug approval in the USA and China, 1983-2022.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Reforming China's Rare Disease Security System: Risk Management Perspectives and a Dedicated Insurance Innovation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Drug lag and associated factors of orphan drugs approved by the U.S. in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Specific drugs for rare diseases in a province of eastern China under catalog management: from 2021 to 2023.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Visual Research of Global Orphan Drug from a Bibliometric Perspective.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare diseases have various types, low incidence rates, complex conditions, and are often difficult to diagnose. Due to China's large population, there is a significant number of rare disease patients, but there is a shortage of orphan drugs. Consequently, these patients often find themselves in a situation where necessary medications are either unavailable or unaffordable. To address this urgent clinical need, China has implemented a series of orphan drug policies aimed at improving drug accessibility and affordability. In terms of drug accessibility, companies are encouraged to expedite drug development through the implementation of tax incentives, guidance for clinical research on rare diseases, and the provision of data protection periods of 6 years, along with market exclusivity periods limited to a maximum of 7 years. Moreover, exemptions for clinical trials, acceptance of overseas clinical trial data, and the creation of a list prioritizing clinically urgent new drugs from overseas have been introduced to expedite the drug registration application, review, inspection, and approval processes. In terms of drug affordability, the import value-added tax on rare disease drugs has been reduced by 3%, and various provinces and cities have established a representative rare disease protection model, which includes special funds, medical assistance programs, and serious disease insurance. The national medical insurance catalog has been adjusted to reduce the financial burden on rare disease patients, resulting in an increase in the number of orphan drugs covered by the catalog to 95 as of March 2024. By comparing orphan drug policies in the United States, the European Union, Japan, Australia, and other countries (or regions), we will provide relevant suggestions to further improve orphan drug policies in China, thus bringing more treatment options and hope to patients with rare diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.