Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38939814›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2024

Echocardiographic Differences in Women Across Subtypes of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.

Laith Alhuneafat, Nada Alrifai, Richard Amoateng, Andreas Kyvernitakis, Ahmad Jabri, Mahathi Indaram, Mark Doyle, Brent A Williams, Indu G Poornima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Postpartum anthropometric and cardiovascular profile following hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: 12-month follow-up.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Examining maternal and fetal outcomes across various subtypes of hypertension during pregnancy.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laith AlhuneafatDepartment of Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nada AlrifaiDepartment of Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Richard AmoatengDepartment of Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Andreas KyvernitakisDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Unitypoint Health, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA.
Ahmad JabriHeart and Vascular Institute, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mahathi IndaramCardiovascular Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mark DoyleCardiovascular Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brent A WilliamsCardiovascular Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Indu G PoornimaCardiovascular Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) can be classified into gestational hypertension, preeclampsia (PRE), and chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia (SPE). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively examine the echocardiographic differences in biventricular structure and function in 3 HDP groups of women in comparison to normotensive pregnant controls. Methods: Women with an echocardiogram during or within the first year of pregnancy were identified within our integrated health network. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, malignancy, autoimmune disease, and structural heart disease. Results: We identified a total of 706 subjects (cases: n = 427, normotensive controls: n = 279). Cases were divided into 3 groups: gestational hypertension (n = 57), PRE (n = 291), and SPE (n = 79). In adjusted analyses, echocardiographic parameters demonstrated a graded difference in left ventricular (LV) mass index, relative wall thickness, mitral inflow E, mitral inflow A, septal e', lateral e', E/e', left atrial volume index, tricuspid velocity, and lateral e' velocities with the most profound findings noted in the SPE group. Specifically, adjusted LV mass index (adjusted β = 14.45, 95% CI: 9.00-19.90) and E/e' (adjusted β = 2.97, 95% CI: 2.27-3.68) was highest in the SPE group in comparison to controls ( Conclusions: LV remodeling and diastolic filling abnormalities are more common in HDP and are most evident in SPE and PRE. Echocardiography during or immediately after pregnancy may be useful in these high-risk women to identify these abnormalities. The long-term implications of these echocardiographic abnormalities require further study.

Indexed as

echocardiographygestationalhypertensionpreeclampsiapregnancyremodeling

Identifiers

PMID38939814
PMCPMC11198092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.