Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38939783›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2024

Notched P-wave on digital electrocardiogram predicts the recurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients who have undergone catheter ablation.

Takafumi Okuyama, Tomoyuki Kabutoya, Kazuomi Kario

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Value of P-Wave Parameters Changes in Predicting Catheter Ablation Outcomes for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takafumi OkuyamaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Jichi Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.
Tomoyuki KabutoyaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Jichi Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5439-4303
Kazuomi KarioDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Jichi Medical University School of Medicine Tochigi Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A notched P-wave is associated with the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the association between a notched P-wave and AF recurrence in patients who have undergone a catheter ablation for AF is unclear. Methods: We enrolled 100 subjects who underwent catheter ablation for AF (paroxysmal AF: 60 cases; persistent AF: 40 cases). Twelve-lead electrocardiography (ECG) was conducted, and the peak-to-peak distance in the M shape was calculated automatically using a 12-lead ECG analysis system. A notched P-wave was defined as a P-wave with an M-shape and a peak-to-peak distance of ≥20 ms in lead II. We compared the recurrence of AF in the patients with notched P-wave and the others. Results: The mean follow-up period was 12 ± 8 months, and a recurrence of AF was observed in 28 patients. The recurrence of AF in the notched P-wave group was significantly higher than that in the controls (log rank 5.14, Conclusions: Automatically identified notched P-waves with peak-to-peak distance ≥20 ms were associated with AF recurrence in patients who had undergone catheter ablation.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcatheter ablationelectrocardiogramprognosisP wave

Identifiers

PMID38939783
PMCPMC11199840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.